Cited by 109Dermatological diseases and infestationsDermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and Allergies

Prevalence of skin diseases in rural areas of Assiut Governorate, Upper Egypt

Abdel‐Hafez, Kamal, Abdel‐Aty, Mahmoud Attia, Hofny, Eman R. M.·2003·International Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Few epidemiological surveys have been carried out to determine the prevalence of skin diseases in the population of Egypt, particularly “Upper Egypt”. So it is a pressing necessity to conduct such a study in rural Assiut. Objectives To determine the prevalence of various skin diseases in rural Assiut. Subjects and methods A cross‐sectional community‐based survey was followed. The survey included 8008 rural inhabitants of all ages and both sexes from a representative of three villages of Assiut Governorate, Upper Egypt. The data were collected through personal interview and examination at homes from December 1994 to December 1996. Results They showed that 6961 (86.93%) of the studied population had one or more skin diseases. The group with parasitic skin infestations had the highest prevalence rate (27.40%) of the total sample, of which pediculosis capitis (19.37%) was the commonest. Eczema/dermatitis group had a rate of 19.82%, with pityriasis alba forming the majority (13.49%). Pigmentary disorders were 17.68%, followed by fungal skin infections (16.17%), then naevoid disorders (16.10%), hair and scalp disorders (12.07%), bacterial skin infections (10.10%), sweat gland disorders (6.16%), acne vulgaris (5.37%). Leprosy constituted 1.6/10,000. Other various skin disorders were recorded. Conclusions Infective‐parasitic diseases were a major problem particularly among the younger age‐group and those of low socio‐economic status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01936.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdel‐Hafez, K., Abdel‐Aty, M. A., & Hofny, E. R. M.
Affiliations
Assiut University (EG)
Corresponding author
Abdel‐Hafez, Kamal
Venue
International Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-23
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
887-892
ISSN
  • 0011-9059 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-4632
OpenAlex
W2108565850
Cited by
109
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Keywords
skin diseases, prevalence, rural population, Assiut Governorate, parasitic skin infestation, head lice, pityriasis alba, atopic dermatitis, skin inflammation, fungal skin infection, bacterial skin infections, leprosy, acne, sweat gland disorders, skin pigmentation disorders, socioeconomic status, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Egypt, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Skin Diseases, Socioeconomic Factors, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review