Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A new measure for cosmic shear

Open access
Schneider, Peter, Van Waerbeke, Ludovic, Jain, Bhuvnesh, Kruse, Guido·1998·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Cosmic shear, i.e. the distortion of images of high-redshift galaxies through the tidal gravitational field of the large-scale matter distribution in the Universe, offers the opportunity to measure the power spectrum of the cosmic density fluctuations without any reference to the relation of dark matter to luminous tracers. We consider here a new statistical measure for cosmic shear, the aperture mass Map(θ), which is defined as a spatially filtered projected density field and which can be measured directly from the image distortions of high-redshift galaxies. By selecting an appropriate spatial filter function, the dispersion of the aperture mass is a convolution of the power spectrum of the projected density field with a narrow kernel, so that 〈M2ap(θ)〉 provides a well-localized estimate of the power spectrum at wavenumbers s ∼ 5/θ. We calculate 〈M2ap〉 for various cosmological models, using the fully non-linear power spectrum of the cosmic density fluctuations. The non-linear evolution yields a significant increase of 〈M2ap〉 relative to the linear growth on scales below ∼ 0°.5. The third-order moment of Map can be used to define a skewness, which is a measure of the non-Gaussianity of the density field. We present the first calculation of the skewness of cosmic shear in the framework of the quasi-linear theory of structure growth. We show that it yields a sensitive measure of the cosmological model; in particular, it is independent of the normalization of the power spectrum. Several practical estimates for 〈M2ap〉 are constructed and their dispersions calculated. On scales below a few arcminutes, the intrinsic ellipticity distribution of galaxies is the dominant source of noise, whereas on larger scales the cosmic variance becomes the most important contribution. We show that measurements of Map in two adjacent apertures are virtually uncorrelated, which implies that an image with side-length L can yield [L/(2θ)]2 mutually independent estimates for Map. We show that one square degree of a high-quality image is sufficient to detect the cosmic shear with the Map-statistic on scales below ∼ 10 arcmin, and to estimate its amplitude with an accuracy of ∼ 30 per cent on scales below ∼ 5 arcmin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01422.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, P., Van Waerbeke, L., Jain, B., & Kruse, G.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1998-06
Volume
296
Issue
4
Pages
873-892
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1967568149
Cited by
396
References
0
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new measure for cosmic shear. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01422.x
The paper
Schneider, P., Van Waerbeke, L., Jain, B., & Kruse, G. (1998). A new measure for cosmic shear. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01422.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.