The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Open accessAbstract
We report a detection of the coherent distortion of faint galaxies arising from gravitational lensing by foreground structures. This ‘cosmic shear’ is potentially the most direct measure of the mass power spectrum, as it is unaffected by poorly justified assumptions made concerning the biasing of the distribution. Our detection is based on an initial imaging study of 14 separated 8×16 arcmin2 fields observed in good, homogeneous conditions with the prime focus EEV-CCD camera of the 4.2-m William Herschel Telescope. We detect an rms shear of 1.6 per cent in 8×8 arcmin2 cells, with a significance of 3.4σ. We carefully justify this detection by quantifying various systematic effects and carrying out extensive simulations of the recovery of the shear signal from artificial images defined according to measured instrument characteristics. We also verify our detection by computing the cross-correlation between the shear in adjacent cells. Including (Gaussian) cosmic variance, we measure the shear variance to be (0.016)2±(0.012)2±(0.006)2, where these 1σ errors correspond to statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Our measurements are consistent with the predictions of cluster-normalized cold dark matter (CDM) models (within 1σ) but a Cosmic Background Explorer normalized standard cold dark matter model is ruled out at the 3.0σ level. For the currently favoured ΛCDM model (with Ωm=0.3), our measurement provides a normalization of the mass power spectrum of σ8=1.5±0.5, fully consistent with that derived from cluster abundances. Our result demonstrates that ground-based telescopes can, with adequate care, be used to constrain the mass power spectrum on various scales. The present results are limited mainly by cosmic variance, which can be overcome in the near future with more observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SExtractor: Software for source extraction
Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. (1996) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series · doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 · Cited by 10,866
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies
Kaiser, N. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/171151 · Cited by 833
A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
Kaiser, N., Squires, G., & Broadhurst, T. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176071 · Cited by 789
Non-linear evolution of cosmological power spectra
Peacock, J. A., & Dodds, S. J. (1996) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/280.3.l19 · Cited by 783
Probing the Universe with Weak Lensing
Mellier, Y. (1999) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.127 · Cited by 490
Cosmological-parameter determination with microwave background maps
Jungman, G., Kamionkowski, M., Kosowsky, A., & Spergel, D. N. (1996) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.1332 · Cited by 453
The 4 Year COBE Normalization and Large‐Scale Structure
Bunn, E. F., & White, M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/303955 · Cited by 423
Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., Frenk, C. S., & Lacey, C. G. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305563 · Cited by 413
A new measure for cosmic shear
Schneider, P., Van Waerbeke, L., Jain, B., & Kruse, G. (1998) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01422.x · Cited by 396
Cited by
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 1,922
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Alarcon, A., Aleksić, J., Allam, S., Allen, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043526 · Cited by 1,213
Self-citationDark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., et al. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023520 · Cited by 1,124
Self-citationIntrinsic alignment-lensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear
Hirata, C. M., & Seljak, U. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.063526 · Cited by 586
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
Metadata
- Authors
- Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 625-640
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2145732552
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 36.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x
- The paper
- Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000). Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.