The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gamma-ray burst afterglows: effects of radiative corrections and non-uniformity of the surrounding medium
Open accessAbstract
The afterglow of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) is commonly thought to be the result of continuous deceleration of a relativistically expanding fireball in the surrounding medium. Assuming that the expansion of the fireball is adiabatic and that the density of the medium is a power-law function of shock radius, i.e. next ∝ R−k, we study the effects of the first-order radiative correction and the non-uniformity of the medium on a GRB afterglow analytically. We first derive a new relation among the observed time, the shock radius and the Lorentz factor of the fireball: t⊕ = R/4(4−k) γ2c, and also derive a new relation among the comoving time, the shock radius and the Lorentz factor of the fireball: tco = 2R/(5−k) γc. We next study the evolution of the fireball by using the analytic solution of Blandford &38; McKee. The radiation losses may not significantly influence this evolution. We further derive new scaling laws both between the X-ray flux and observed time and between the optical flux and observed time. We use these scaling laws to discuss the afterglows of GRB 970228 and GRB 970616, and find that if the spectral index of the electron distribution is p = 2.5, implied from the spectra of GRBs, the X-ray afterglow of GRB 970616 is well fitted by assuming k = 2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhang, B., Fan, Y. Z., Dyks, J., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., & Gehrels, N. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500723 · Cited by 1,079
“This could be because of either a continuous operation of the central engine (Dai & Lu 1998a; Zhang & Mészáros 2001; Dai 2004), or a power-law distribution of the Lorentz factors in the ejecta that results in slower ejecta catching up with the decelerated fireball at later times (Rees&Mészáros…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
Overall Evolution of Jetted Gamma‐Ray Burst Ejecta
Huang, Y. F., Gou, L. J., Dai, Z. G., & Lu, T. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/317076 · Cited by 269
Self-citationA complete reference of the analytical synchrotron external shock models of gamma-ray bursts
Gao, H., Lei, W.-H., Zou, Y.-C., Wu, X.-F., & Zhang, B. (2013) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2013.10.001 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, Z. G., & Lu, T.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-07-21
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-92
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2046334594
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gamma-ray burst afterglows: effects of radiative corrections and non-uniformity of the surrounding medium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01681.x
- The paper
- Dai, Z. G., & Lu, T. (1998). Gamma-ray burst afterglows: effects of radiative corrections and non-uniformity of the surrounding medium. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01681.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.