The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A ROSAT High Resolution Imager survey of bright nearby galaxies
Open accessAbstract
We use the extensive public archive of ROSAT High Resolution Imager (HRI) observations to carry out a statistical investigation of the X-ray properties of nearby galaxies. Specifically we focus on the sample of 486 bright () northern galaxies studied by Ho, Filippenko and Sargent (HFS) in the context of their exploration of the optical spectroscopic properties of nearby galactic nuclei. Over 20 per cent of HFS galaxies are encompassed in ROSAT HRI fields of reasonable (10 ks) exposure. The X-ray sources detected within the optical extent of each galaxy are categorized as either nuclear or non-nuclear, depending on whether the source is positioned within or outside a 25-arcsec radius circle centred on the optical nucleus. A nuclear X-ray source is detected in over 70 per cent of the galaxies harbouring either a Seyfert or LINER nucleus, compared with a detection rate of only ∼40 per cent in less active systems. The correlation of the Hα luminosity with nuclear X-ray luminosity previously observed in QSOs and bright Seyfert 1 galaxies appears to extend down into the regime of ultra-low luminosity (LX∼1038−1040 erg s−1) active galactic nuclei (AGN). The inferred accretion rates for this sample of low-luminosity AGN are significantly sub-Eddington. In total, 142 non-nuclear sources were detected. In combination with published data for M31, this leads to a luminosity distribution (normalized to an optical blue luminosity of 1010 L⊙) for the discrete X-ray source population in spiral galaxies of the form where L38 is the X-ray luminosity in units of 1038 erg s−1. The implied LXLB ratio is ∼1.1×1039 erg s−1(1010 L⊙)−1. The nature of the substantial number of ‘superluminous’ non-nuclear objects detected in the survey is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advection-dominated Accretion: Underfed Black Holes and Neutron Stars
Narayan, R., & Yi, I. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176343 · Cited by 1,679
Cited by
Massive Black Holes as Population III Remnants
Madau, P., & Rees, M. J. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/319848 · Cited by 953
Gladstone, J. C., Roberts, T. P., & Done, C. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15123.x · Cited by 454
Self-citationCOLEMAN MILLER, M., & COLBERT, E. J. M. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271804004426 · Cited by 443
The Ultraluminous X‐Ray Source Population from the Chandra Archive of Galaxies
Swartz, D. A., Ghosh, K. K., Tennant, A. F., & Wu, K. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/422842 · Cited by 337
Ultraluminous X-ray sources in the Chandra and XMM-Newton era
Feng, H., & Soria, R. (2011) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2011.08.002 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, T. P., & Warwick, R. S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06-11
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-114
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2096799509
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A ROSAT High Resolution Imager survey of bright nearby galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03384.x
- The paper
- Roberts, T. P., & Warwick, R. S. (2000). A ROSAT High Resolution Imager survey of bright nearby galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03384.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.