The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supernova hosts for gamma-ray burst jets: dynamical constraints
Open accessAbstract
I constrain a possible supernova origin for gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) by modelling the dynamical interaction between a relativistic jet and a stellar envelope surrounding it. The delay in observer time introduced by the jet traversing the envelope should not be long compared with the duration of gamma-ray emission; also, the jet should not be swallowed by the spherical explosion it powers. The only stellar progenitors that comfortably satisfy these constraints, if one assumes that jets move ballistically within their host stars, are compact carbon–oxygen or helium post-Wolf–Rayet stars (type Ic or Ib supernovae); type II supernovae are ruled out. Notably, very massive stars do not appear to be capable of producing the observed bursts at any redshift unless the stellar envelope is stripped prior to collapse. The presence of a dense stellar wind places an upper limit on the Lorentz factor of the jet in the internal shock model; however, this constraint may be evaded if the wind is swept forward by a photon precursor. Shock breakout and cocoon blowout are considered individually; neither presents a likely source of precursors for cosmological GRBs. These envelope constraints could conceivably be circumvented if jets are laterally pressure-confined while traversing the outer stellar envelope. If so, jets responsible for observed GRBs must have been launched from a region several hundred kilometres wide, have been crossed by strong shocks, or have mixed with envelope material as they travel. A phase of pressure confinement and mixing would imprint correlations among jets that may explain observed GRB variability–luminosity and lag–luminosity correlations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves
Blandford, R. D., & McKee, C. F. (1976) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.861619 · Cited by 1,215
Ostriker, J. P., & McKee, C. F. (1988) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.60.1 · Cited by 436
Cited by
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era
Gehrels, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Fox, D. B. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145147 · Cited by 615
THE PROPAGATION OF RELATIVISTIC JETS IN EXTERNAL MEDIA
Bromberg, O., Nakar, E., Piran, T., & Sari, R. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/740/2/100 · Cited by 361
Numerically calibrated model for propagation of a relativistic unmagnetized jet in dense media
Harrison, R., Gottlieb, O., & Nakar, E. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty760 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Matzner, C. D.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 575-589
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2074241416
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supernova hosts for gamma-ray burst jets: dynamical constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06969.x
- The paper
- Matzner, C. D. (2003). Supernova hosts for gamma-ray burst jets: dynamical constraints. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06969.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.