The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life‐history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction
Open accessAbstract
Earlier experiments have shown that the evolution of postponed senescent populations can be achieved by selection on either demographic or stress resistance characters. Both types of selection have produced results in which survival characters (stress resistance and longevity) have apparently traded‐off against early‐life fecundity. Here we present the results of a series of experiments in which an environmental variable — the level of live yeast inoculate applied to the substrate — produces a qualitatively similar phenotypic response: longevity and starvation resistance are enhanced by lower yeast levels, at the expense of fecundity. For the starvation resistance versus fecundity experiments we show a negative and linear relationship between the norms of reaction for each character across a gradient of yeast levels. This phenotypic trade‐off is stable across the 20 populations and 4 selection treatments reported on here, and its general agreement with earlier selection results suggests that the evolutionary response and the phenotypically plastic response may share a common physiological basis. However, an important discrepancy in the lifetime fecundity data between the selection response and the dietary manipulations preclude strict analogy. The results broadly conform to a simple “Y‐model” of allocation, in which a limited resource is divided between survival and reproduction; here the characters are starvation resistance and longevity versus fecundity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: the in vivo evidence
Baur, J. A., & Sinclair, D. A. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2060 · Cited by 3,958
Sirtuin activators mimic caloric restriction and delay ageing in metazoans
Wood, J. G., Rogina, B., Lavu, S., Howitz, K., Helfand, S. L., Tatar, M., & Sinclair, D. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02789 · Cited by 1,868
The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals
Zera, A. J., & Harshman, L. G. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114006 · Cited by 1,577
Microbiome interactions shape host fitness
Gould, A. L., Zhang, V., Lamberti, L., Jones, E. W., Obadia, B., Korasidis, N., Gavryushkin, A., Carlson, J. M., Beerenwinkel, N., & Ludington, W. B. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1809349115 · Cited by 579
Calories Do Not Explain Extension of Life Span by Dietary Restriction in Drosophila
Mair, W., Piper, M. D. W., & Partridge, L. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030223 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Chippindale, A. K., Leroi, A. M., Kim, S. B., & Rose, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-193
- ISSN
- 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9101
- OpenAlex
- W4245403460
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life‐history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6020171.x
- The paper
- Chippindale, A. K., Leroi, A. M., Kim, S. B., & Rose, M. R. (1993). Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life‐history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6020171.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.