The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life history evolution. 2. Diet, mates and the cost of reproduction
Abstract
While it is commonplace for biologists to use the response to environmental manipulation as a guide to evolutionary responses to selection, the relationship between phenotypic plasticity and genetic change is not generally well‐established. The life‐histories of laboratory Drosophila populations are among the few experimental systems which simultaneously afford information on phenotypic plasticity and evolutionary trajectories. We employed a combination of two replicated selectively differentiated stocks (postponed aging stocks and their controls; 10 populations in total) and two different environmental manipulations (nutrition and mating) to explore the empirical relationship between phenotypic plasticity and evolutionary trajectories. While there are a number of parallels between the results obtained using these two approaches, there are important differences. In particular, as the detail of the biological characterization of either type of response increases, so their disparities multiply. Nonetheless, the combination of environmental manipulation with evolutionary divergence provides valuable information about the biological connections between life‐history, caloric reserves, and reproductive physiology in Drososphila.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
Cited by
Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: the in vivo evidence
Baur, J. A., & Sinclair, D. A. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2060 · Cited by 3,958
Sirtuin activators mimic caloric restriction and delay ageing in metazoans
Wood, J. G., Rogina, B., Lavu, S., Howitz, K., Helfand, S. L., Tatar, M., & Sinclair, D. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02789 · Cited by 1,868
The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals
Zera, A. J., & Harshman, L. G. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114006 · Cited by 1,577
Microbiome interactions shape host fitness
Gould, A. L., Zhang, V., Lamberti, L., Jones, E. W., Obadia, B., Korasidis, N., Gavryushkin, A., Carlson, J. M., Beerenwinkel, N., & Ludington, W. B. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1809349115 · Cited by 579
Calories Do Not Explain Extension of Life Span by Dietary Restriction in Drosophila
Mair, W., Piper, M. D. W., & Partridge, L. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030223 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Chippindale, A. K., Leroi, A. M., Saing, H., Borash, D. J., & Rose, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-293
- ISSN
- 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2116340247
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life history evolution. 2. Diet, mates and the cost of reproduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1997.10030269.x
- The paper
- Chippindale, A. K., Leroi, A. M., Saing, H., Borash, D. J., & Rose, M. R. (1997). Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life history evolution. 2. Diet, mates and the cost of reproduction. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1997.10030269.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
