The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electroconvulsive treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a review and report of cases
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a potentially lethal adverse effect of neuroleptic medication, with no satisfactory treatment currently available. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been anecdotally reported to be effective in its treatment. We review 45 published case reports of ECT for NMS and describe nine new cases, to examine its effectiveness, the likelihood of adverse reactions, and the theoretical implications of such treatment. METHOD: The authors used Medline to identify reports in the English literature where ECT was used in cases of suspected NMS. In addition, the charts of patients referred to the second author for treatment of NMS were reviewed and cases in which ECT used were identified. RESULTS: The case reports suggest that ECT is effective in many individuals with NMS, even when drug therapy has failed. The response is usually apparent after a few treatments, generally up to six. The response is not predictable on the basis of age, gender, psychiatric diagnosis or any particular feature of NMS including catatonia. Electroconvulsive therapy is a relatively safe treatment in NMS, although the risk of cardiovascular complications should be considered. Malignant hyperthermia due to the anaesthesia associated with ECT has not been reported in patients with NMS, and succinylcholine has been used safely with the exception of one report of fever and raised creatine kinase levels and another report of hyperkalemia. CONCLUSIONS: Electroconvulsive therapy is the preferred treatment in severe NMS, cases where the underlying psychiatric diagnosis is psychotic depression or catatonia, and in cases where lethal catatonia cannot be ruled out. The effectiveness of ECT for the treatment of NMS has theoretical implications for the relationship between NMS and catatonia, and the possible pathophysiological mechanisms that underlie these disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Strawn, J. R., Keck, P. E., & Caroff, S. N. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.6.870 · Cited by 579
Management of common adverse effects of antipsychotic medications
Stroup, T. S., & Gray, N. (2018) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20567 · Cited by 572
Catatonia: A Clinician's Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment
Fink, M., & Taylor, M. A. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511543777 · Cited by 269
Current electroconvulsive therapy practice and research in the geriatric population
Kerner, N., & Prudic, J. (2014) · Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.2217/npy.14.3 · Cited by 146
Medical Complications of Psychiatric Treatment
Lahijani, S. C., & Harris, K. A. (2017) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2017.03.008 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Trollor, J. N., & Sachdev, P. S.
- Venue
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 650-659
- ISSN
- 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1614
- OpenAlex
- W2110981514
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electroconvulsive treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a review and report of cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00630.x
- The paper
- Trollor, J. N., & Sachdev, P. S. (1999). Electroconvulsive treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a review and report of cases. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00630.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.