Cited by 10Psychiatric care and mental health servicesSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and Access

A comparison of patient clinical and social outcomes before and after the introduction of an extended-hours community mental health team

Open access
Habibis, Daphne, Hazelton, Mike, Schneider, Rosemary, Bowling, Alison, Davidson, John·2002·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the addition of standard community treatment to a hospital-based service in a regional district of Australia. METHOD: The study was a naturalistic investigation of a routine clinical service and utilized a longitudinal panel design. Two matched groups of seriously mentally ill patients were recruited,one before the addition of the community mental health team (CMHT)and one after. Each sample was followed up for one year using a semistructured questionnaire and instruments including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Global Assessment Scale, the Life Skills Profile and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale as well as hospital records. RESULTS: Patients in both groups showed similar patterns of improvements. Although the aims of the new service included reducing in-patient utilization and improving social functioning,there were few significant differences between the two groups. While the number of admissions and length of stay were lower in the post-CMHTsample most were admitted rather than treated in their homes by the CMHT. CONCLUSION: The study concludes that better outcomes might have been achieved if the aims of the CMHT had been limited to either crisis or rehabilitation interventions, but not both. More attention needs to be paid to the service context in which model programmes are introduced so that new developments can be more closely tailored to the realities of what is likely to be achievable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01033.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An extended-hours community mental health team and bilingual case management had no significant effect on any of the outcomes assessed.

    “An extended-hours community mental health team and bilingual case management had no significant effect on any of the outcomes assessed (Ziguras 2001;Habibis et al. 2002).”

    From Effect of community mental health care programs in Australia: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Habibis et al. 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Habibis, D., Hazelton, M., Schneider, R., Bowling, A., & Davidson, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Launceston General Hospital (AU)
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2002-01
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
392-398
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2153911266
Cited by
9
References
18
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
community mental health teams, severe mental illness, hospital-based mental health services, hospitalization, length of hospital stay, social functioning, self-esteem, life skills, service evaluation, crisis intervention, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Australia, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review