Cited by 181Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Focus group study of endometriosis: Struggle, loss and the medical merry‐go‐round

Cox, Helen, Henderson, Lorraine, Andersen, Natalie, Cagliarini, Glenda, Ski, Chantal·2003·International Journal of Nursing Practice

Abstract

Women with endometriosis experience a range of problems for which they may or may not be adequately supported. This paper reports on one aspect of a study conducted at the Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, to identify the information needs of women facing laparoscopy for endometriosis. A number of focus groups were conducted that provided women with a forum for communicating their experiences of endometriosis and laparoscopy. The findings include the experiences of 61 women who described the lack of support, the struggles and the losses involved in living with endometriosis. By far the worst experience that these women described was the encounter with health professionals and the ways in which their symptoms were trivialised and dismissed. There is a great deal for nurses to learn about the experience of living with endometriosis if they are to support women with this chronic illness in their search for well‐being.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-172x.2003.00396.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Endometriosis Association (Vic)., 2000, What Is Endometriosis?
  2. Carlton D, 1996, Awareness of endometriosis, Practice Nurse, 12, 514
  3. Montague M, 1997, Report to the Department of Health and Family Services General Practice Evaluation Program 1997, 358
  4. Garner C, 1996, Coping with endometriosis, Office Nurse, 9, 14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Cox, H., Henderson, L., Andersen, N., Cagliarini, G., & Ski, C.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Epworth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Cox, Helen
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
2-9
ISSN
  • 1322-7114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-172X
OpenAlex
W2030858367
Cited by
181
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
endometriosis, lived experience, patient support, information needs, laparoscopy, health professional-patient relationship, chronic disease, women's health, nursing support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Communication, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Pain, Laparoscopy, Physician-Patient Relations, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review