Cited by 30Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEthics and bioethics in healthcareEthics in Clinical Research

Reliability of clinical judgment of patients’ competency to give informed consent: A case vignette study

Open access
Kitamura, Toshinori, Kitamura, Fusako·2000·Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

The competency of psychiatric patients to give informed consent is important in respecting patients' decisions as well as protecting patients from undue exploitation. A total of 176 members of the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology gave a clinical judgment in a questionnaire of competency in five case transcriptions. Their interrater reliability of competency judgment was slight (generalized kappa 0.31). Clinicians' global judgment of patients' competency was not reliable, but it may be improved by the use of a structured interview.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00665.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have shown physicians frequently disagree on the competency of psychiatric patients who request assisted death - inter-rater reliability of capacity judgments by clinicians without the aid of standardized assessments is low, and modest evidence suggests clinicians tend to overestimate capacity.

    “Studies have shown physicians frequently disagree on the competency of psychiatric patients who request assisted death — inter-rater reliability of capacity judgments by clinicians without the aid of standardized assessments is low, and modest evidence suggests clinicians tend to overestimate capacity (6, 47–50).”

    From Assisted death in eating disorders: a systematic review of cases and clinical rationales (2024) · cites this paper as [47]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hasui C, Sugiura T, Tanaka E et al. Reliability of child- hood mental disorder: Diagnoses by Japanese psycholo- gists. Psychiatr. Clin. Neurosci. 1999; 53: 57-61.
  2. Tomoda A, Yasumiya R, Sumiyama T et al. Validity and reliability of Structured Interview for Competency In- competency Assessment Testing and Ranking Inventory (SICIATRI). J. Clin. Psychol. 1997; 53: 443-450.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitamura, T., & Kitamura, F.
Affiliations
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
Venue
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-04
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
245-247
ISSN
  • 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1819
OpenAlex
W2101731365
Cited by
30
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Pfizer Health Research Foundation
  • Japan Science Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
informed consent, decision-making capacity, competency assessment, psychiatric patients, inter-rater reliability, clinical judgment, structured interviews, case vignettes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Expert Testimony, Female, Humans, Informed Consent, Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Mental Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review