Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantification and localization of PEGylated polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles in brain and spinal cord during experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in the rat

Calvo, Pilar, Gouritin, Bruno, Villarroya, Henri, Eclancher, Françoise, Giannavola, Claudia, Klein, Christophe, Andreux, Jean P., Couvreur, Patrick·2002·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Under healthy conditions, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits the passage of solutes and cells from the blood to the CNS. During neurological diseases, BBB permeability increases dramatically and it has been hypothesized that drug carrier systems such as polymeric nanoparticles could cross the BBB and penetrate into the CNS. PEGylated polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles (long‐circulating carrier) are one such system and have been investigated during experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE). Brain and spinal cord concentrations of [14 C]‐radiolabelled PEGylated polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles were compared with another blood long‐circulating carrier (poloxamine 908‐coated polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles) and with conventional non‐long‐circulating polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles. The microscopic localization of fluorescent nanoparticles in the CNS was also investigated in order to further understand the mechanism by which the particles penetrate the BBB. The results demonstrate that the concentration of PEGylated nanoparticles in the CNS, especially in white matter, is greatly increased in comparison to conventional non‐PEGylated nanoparticles. In addition, this increase was significantly higher in pathological situations where BBB permeability is augmented and/or macrophages have infiltrated. Passive diffusion and macrophage uptake in inflammatory lesions seems to be the mechanism underlying such particles' brain penetration. Based on their long‐circulating properties in blood and on their surface characteristics that allow cell interactions, PEGylated nanoparticles penetrated into CNS to a larger extent than all the other formulations tested. Thus, PEGylated polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles are proposed here as a new brain delivery system for neuroinflammatory diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01967.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Calvo, P., Gouritin, B., Villarroya, H., Eclancher, F., Giannavola, C., Klein, C., Andreux, J. P., & Couvreur, P.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-04
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
1317-1326
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2094952575
Cited by
164
References
2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification and localization of PEGylated polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles in brain and spinal cord during experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01967.x
The paper
Calvo, P., Gouritin, B., Villarroya, H., Eclancher, F., Giannavola, C., Klein, C., Andreux, J. P., & Couvreur, P. (2002). Quantification and localization of PEGylated polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles in brain and spinal cord during experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in the rat. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01967.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.