Cited by 708Barrier Structure and Function StudiesNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Overcoming the Blood–Brain Barrier: The Role of Nanomaterials in Treating Neurological Diseases

Open access
Furtado, Denzil, Björnmalm, Mattias, Ayton, Scott, Bush, Ashley I., Kempe, Kristian, Caruso, Frank·2018·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Therapies directed toward the central nervous system remain difficult to translate into improved clinical outcomes. This is largely due to the blood–brain barrier (BBB), arguably the most tightly regulated interface in the human body, which routinely excludes most therapeutics. Advances in the engineering of nanomaterials and their application in biomedicine (i.e., nanomedicine) are enabling new strategies that have the potential to help improve our understanding and treatment of neurological diseases. Herein, the various mechanisms by which therapeutics can be delivered to the brain are examined and key challenges facing translation of this research from benchtop to bedside are highlighted. Following a contextual overview of the BBB anatomy and physiology in both healthy and diseased states, relevant therapeutic strategies for bypassing and crossing the BBB are discussed. The focus here is especially on nanomaterial‐based drug delivery systems and the potential of these to overcome the biological challenges imposed by the BBB. Finally, disease‐targeting strategies and clearance mechanisms are explored. The objective is to provide the diverse range of researchers active in the field (e.g., material scientists, chemists, engineers, neuroscientists, and clinicians) with an easily accessible guide to the key opportunities and challenges currently facing the nanomaterial‐mediated treatment of neurological diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201801362

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The complexity of the CNS, coupled with the blood-brain barrier, poses challenges to delivering therapeutics to affected regions of the brain or spinal cord effectively.

    “The complexity of the CNS, coupled with the blood-brain barrier (BBB), poses challenges to deliver therapeutics to affected regions of the brain or spinal cord effectively [23, 24].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Furtado, D., Björnmalm, M., Ayton, S., Bush, A. I., Kempe, K., & Caruso, F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Bush, Ashley I.
  • Kempe, Kristian
  • Caruso, Frank
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-31
Volume
30
Issue
46
Pages
e1801362-e1801362
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2885518311
Cited by
708
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (CE140100036)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1135806, APP1109945)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
blood-brain barrier, nanomaterials, nanomedicine, brain drug delivery, neurological disorders, translation to clinical practice
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Biological Transport, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Central Nervous System, Humans, Ligands, Multiple Sclerosis, Nervous System Diseases, Parkinson Disease, Drug Design, Drug Delivery Systems, Stroke, Nanostructures, Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles, Translational Research, Biomedical, Transcytosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review