Cited by 107Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Vagal modulation of nociception is mediated by adrenomedullary epinephrine in the rat

Open access
G. Khasar, Sachia, G. Green, Paul, Miao, Frederick J.‐P., Levine, Jon D.·2003·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Vagal afferent activity modulates mechanical nociceptive threshold and inflammatory mediator‐induced hyperalgesia, effects that are mediated by the adrenal medulla. To evaluate the role of epinephrine, the major hormone released from the adrenal medulla, the β 2‐adrenergic receptor antagonist ICI 118,551 was chronically administered to vagotomized rats and epinephrine to normal rats. In vagotomized rats, chronic administration of ICI 118,551 markedly attenuated vagotomy‐induced enhancement of bradykinin hyperalgesia but had no effect on nociceptive threshold. In normal rats, chronic epinephrine had the opposite effect, enhancing bradykinin hyperalgesia. Like vagotomy‐, epinephrine‐induced enhancement of hyperalgesia developed slowly, taking 14 days to reach its peak. Vagotomy induced a chronic elevation in plasma concentrations of epinephrine. We suggest that ongoing activity in vagal afferents inhibits the release of epinephrine from the adrenal medulla. Chronically elevated levels of epinephrine, occurring after vagotomy, desensitize peripheral β 2‐adrenergic receptors and lead to enhancement of bradykinin hyperalgesia. The ability of prolonged elevated plasma levels of epinephrine to sensitize bradykinin receptors could contribute to chronic generalized pain syndromes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02503.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rodents, vagotomy increases plasma epinephrine concentrations at baseline and after immobilization stress.

    “and increased epinephrine concentrations in plasma at baseline and after immobilization stress (Khasar et al., 2003;Mravec et al., 2015).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Khasar et al., 2003

    The Plasma epinephrine section reports higher plasma epinephrine in vagotomized rats than in sham-vagotomized rats at 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery, supporting the baseline portion. The paper does not report epinephrine measurements after immobilization stress in vagotomized rats; its Discussion mentions stress-related catecholamine elevations only in general. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Leineweber, K., Heinroth-Hoffmann, I., Ponicke, K., Abraham, G., Osten, B. & Brodde, O.E. (2002) Cardiac beta-adrenoceptor desensitization due to ß 2003 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 909-915 914
  2. S. G. Khasar et al. 14609568, 2003, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02503.x by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [17/08/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License increased beta-adrenoceptor kinase activity in chronic uremia. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 13, 117-124. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
G. Khasar, S., G. Green, P., Miao, F. J. ‐., & Levine, J. D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Levine, Jon D.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
909-915
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2075886029
Cited by
107
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01nr004880-05)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NR004880)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
vagal afferents, epinephrine, adrenal medulla, beta2-adrenergic receptor, inflammatory hyperalgesia, mechanical nociceptive threshold, vagotomy, ICI 118,551, sympathetic nervous system
MeSH terms
Adrenal Medulla, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Bradykinin, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Epinephrine, Hyperalgesia, Male, Pain Measurement, Physical Stimulation, Propanolamines, Propranolol, Time Factors, Vagotomy, Vagus Nerve, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pain Threshold, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review