The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion
Open accessAbstract
Since the 1940s, the distributions of several butterfly species have been expanding in northern Europe, probably in response to climate warming. We focus on the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria in order to determine impacts of habitat availability on expansion rates. We analyse observed expansion rates since 1940 and also use a spatially explicit mechanistic model (MIGRATE) to simulate range expansion in two areas of the UK which differ in their distribution of breeding habitat (woodland). Observed and simulated expansion rates were in very close agreement but were 42%–45% slower in an area that had 24% less woodland. Unlike P. aegeria, the majority of butterfly species are not currently expanding, almost certainly because of lack of suitable habitat. Incorporating the spatial distribution of habitat into investigations of range changes is likely to be important in determining those species that can and cannot expand, and for predicting potential future range changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change
Warren, M. S., Hill, J. K., Thomas, J. A., Asher, J., Fox, R., Huntley, B., Roy, D. B., Telfer, M. G., Jeffcoate, S., Harding, P., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102054 · Cited by 1,333
Self-citationOliver, T. H., & Morecroft, M. D. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.271 · Cited by 613
Do species’ traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges?: Traits and range shifts
Angert, A. L., Crozier, L. G., Rissler, L. J., Gilman, S. E., Tewksbury, J. J., & Chunco, A. J. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01620.x · Cited by 591
Urbanization and homogenization – Comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany
Kühn, I., & Klotz, S. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.033 · Cited by 381
Climate Change and Evolutionary Adaptations at Species' Range Margins
Hill, J. K., Griffiths, H. M., & Thomas, C. D. (2011) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144746 · Cited by 351
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, J. K., Collingham, Y. C., Thomas, C. D., Blakeley, D. S., Fox, R., Moss, D., & Huntley, B.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-07-22
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-321
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2026793433
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00222.x
- The paper
- Hill, J. K., Collingham, Y. C., Thomas, C. D., Blakeley, D. S., Fox, R., Moss, D., & Huntley, B. (2001). Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00222.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.