The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Jasmonate‐deficient plants have reduced direct and indirect defences against herbivores
Open accessAbstract
Plants employ a variety of defence mechanisms, some of which act directly by having a negative effect on herbivores and others that act indirectly by attracting natural enemies of herbivores. In this study we asked if a common jasmonate‐signalling pathway links the regulation of direct and indirect defences in plants. We examined the performance of herbivores (direct defence) and the attraction of natural enemies of herbivores (indirect defence) to wild‐type tomato plants and mutant plants that are deficient in the production of the signalling hormone jasmonic acid. Wild‐type plants supported lower survivorship of caterpillars compared with jasmonic acid‐deficient plants. Damaged wild‐type plants were more attractive to predaceous mites compared with undamaged wild‐type plants, whereas damaged jasmonate‐deficient plants were not more attractive to predators. Damaged wild‐type plants induced a greater production of volatile compounds (primarily the sesquiterpene β‐caryophyllene and the monoterpenes α‐pinene, β‐pinene, 2‐carene and β‐phellandrene) compared with damaged jasmonate‐deficient plants. Treating jasmonate‐deficient plants with exogenous jasmonic acid restored both the direct and indirect defence capabilities, demonstrating that jasmonic acid is an essential regulatory component for the expression of direct and indirect plant defence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Volatile Signaling in Plant-Plant Interactions: "Talking Trees" in the Genomics Era
Baldwin, I. T., Halitschke, R., Paschold, A., von Dahl, C. C., & Preston, C. A. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1118446 · Cited by 892
Sesquiterpenoids Lactones: Benefits to Plants and People
Chadwick, M., Trewin, H., Gawthrop, F., & Wagstaff, C. (2013) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms140612780 · Cited by 674
Biogenic volatile organic compounds in the Earth system
Laothawornkitkul, J., Taylor, J. E., Paul, N. D., & Hewitt, C. N. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02859.x · Cited by 673
Li, L., Zhao, Y., McCaig, B. C., Wingerd, B. A., Wang, J., Whalon, M. E., Pichersky, E., & Howe, G. A. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.017954 · Cited by 673
PLANT-MEDIATED INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS AND HERBIVOROUS ARTHROPODS
Stout, M. J., Thaler, J. S., & Thomma, B. P. H. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151117 · Cited by 463
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thaler, J. S., Farag, M. A., Paré, P. W., & Dicke, M.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 764-774
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2124658639
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Jasmonate‐deficient plants have reduced direct and indirect defences against herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00388.x
- The paper
- Thaler, J. S., Farag, M. A., Paré, P. W., & Dicke, M. (2002). Jasmonate‐deficient plants have reduced direct and indirect defences against herbivores. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00388.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.