Cited by 892Insect-Plant Interactions and ControlPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

Volatile Signaling in Plant-Plant Interactions: "Talking Trees" in the Genomics Era

Baldwin, Ian T., Halitschke, Rayko, Paschold, Anja, von Dahl, Caroline C., Preston, Catherine A.·2006·Science

Abstract

Plants may "eavesdrop" on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by herbivore-attacked neighbors to activate defenses before being attacked themselves. Transcriptome and signal cascade analyses of VOC-exposed plants suggest that plants eavesdrop to prime direct and indirect defenses and to hone competitive abilities. Advances in research on VOC biosynthesis and perception have facilitated the production of plants that are genetically "deaf" to particular VOCs or "mute" in elements of their volatile vocabulary. Such plants, together with advances in VOC analytical instrumentation, will allow researchers to determine whether fluency enhances the fitness of plants in natural communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1118446

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Volatile secondary metabolites such as terpenoids, green-leaf volatiles, and aromatic compounds can also regulate plant defenses.

    “Apart from glucosinolates and benzoxazinoids, volatile secondary metabolites such as terpenoids, green-leaf volatiles, and aromatic compounds can also regulate plant defenses (Baldwin et al., 2006;Godard et al., 2008;Erb, 2018;Bouwmeester et al., 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldwin, I. T., Halitschke, R., Paschold, A., von Dahl, C. C., & Preston, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US)
  • Department of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans Knöll Strasse 8, Jena 07745, Germany.
Corresponding author
Baldwin, Ian T.
Venue
Science
Published
2006-02-10
Volume
311
Issue
5762
Pages
812-815
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2123191559
Cited by
892
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
volatile organic compounds, plant-plant communication, indirect plant defense, herbivore-induced plant volatiles, defense priming, plant competition, plant fitness
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Diffusion, Mutation, Organic Chemicals, Plants, Volatilization, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Leaves, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review