The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plant–soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges
Open accessAbstract
One explanation for the higher abundance of invasive species in their non‐native than native ranges is the escape from natural enemies. But there are few experimental studies comparing the parallel impact of enemies (or competitors and mutualists) on a plant species in its native and invaded ranges, and release from soil pathogens has been rarely investigated. Here we present evidence showing that the invasion of black cherry (Prunus serotina) into north‐western Europe is facilitated by the soil community. In the native range in the USA, the soil community that develops near black cherry inhibits the establishment of neighbouring conspecifics and reduces seedling performance in the greenhouse. In contrast, in the non‐native range, black cherry readily establishes in close proximity to conspecifics, and the soil community enhances the growth of its seedlings. Understanding the effects of soil organisms on plant abundance will improve our ability to predict and counteract plant invasions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wisz, M. S., Pottier, J., Kissling, W. D., Pellissier, L., Lenoir, J., Damgaard, C. F., Dormann, C. F., Forchhammer, M. C., Grytnes, J., Guisan, A., et al. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00235.x · Cited by 1,769
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
“In conclusion, our results reveal a novel mechanism by which an invasive plant can disrupt native communities: by virtually eliminating the activity of native AMF from the soil and drastically impairing the growth of native canopy species. It is currently unclear precisely which phytochemicals produced by garlic musta…”
BackgroundHIERRO, J. L., MARON, J. L., & CALLAWAY, R. M. (2005) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00953.x · Cited by 836
Adapt or disperse: understanding species persistence in a changing world
BERG, M. P., KIERS, E. T., DRIESSEN, G., Van Der HEIJDEN, M., KOOI, B. W., KUENEN, F., LIEFTING, M., VERHOEF, H. A., & ELLERS, J. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02014.x · Cited by 616
Root competition: beyond resource depletion
SCHENK, H. J. (2006) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01124.x · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinhart, K. O., Packer, A., Van der Putten, W. H., & Clay, K.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1046-1050
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2123465761
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant–soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00539.x
- The paper
- Reinhart, K. O., Packer, A., Van der Putten, W. H., & Clay, K. (2003). Plant–soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00539.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.