The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Root competition: beyond resource depletion
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Root competition is defined as a reduction in the availability of a soil resource to roots that is caused by other roots. Resource availability to competitors can be affected through resource depletion (scramble competition) and by mechanisms that inhibit access of other roots to resources (contest competition, such as allelopathy). It has been proposed that soil heterogeneity can cause size‐asymmetric root competition. Support for this hypothesis is limited and contradictory, possibly because resource uptake is affected more by the amount and spatial distribution of resource‐acquiring organs, relative to the spatial distribution of resources, than by root system size per se. Root competition intensity between individual plants generally decreases as resource availability (but not necessarily habitat productivity) increases, but the importance of root competition relative to other factors that structure communities may increase with resource availability. Soil organisms play important, and often species‐specific, roles in root interactions. The findings that some roots can detect other roots, or inert objects, before they are contacted and can distinguish between self and non‐self roots create experimental challenges for those attempting to untangle the effects of self/non‐self root recognition, self‐inhibition and root segregation or proliferation in response to competition. Recent studies suggesting that root competition may represent a ‘tragedy‐of‐the‐commons’ may have failed to account for this complexity. Theories about potential effects of root competition on plant diversity (and vice versa) appear to be ahead of the experimental evidence, with only one study documenting different effects of root competition on plant diversity under different levels of resource availability. Roots can interact with their biotic and abiotic environments using a large variety of often species‐specific mechanisms, far beyond the traditional view that plants interact mainly through resource depletion. Research on root interactions between exotic invasives and native species holds great promise for a better understanding of the way in which root competition may affect community structure and plant diversity, and may create new insights into coevolution of plants, their competitors and the soil community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Perry, L. G., Thelen, G. C., Ridenour, W. M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01044.x · Cited by 121
RetractedHardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Trenbath, B., & Harper, J. L. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402622 · Cited by 6,942
Hardin, G. (2009) · Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research · doi:10.1080/19390450903037302 · Cited by 6,367
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Consequences of changing biodiversity
Chapin III, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012241 · Cited by 4,282
Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments
Loreau, M., & Hector, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083573 · Cited by 3,528
Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition
Schoener, T. W. (1983) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284133 · Cited by 2,361
Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands
Hector, A., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C., Caldeira, M. C., Diemer, M., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., Finn, J. A., Freitas, H., Giller, P. S., Good, J., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5442.1123 · Cited by 2,125
Cited by
Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities
Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Christoffersen, B. O., Dietze, M. C., Farrior, C. E., Holm, J. A., Hurtt, G. C., Knox, R. G., Lawrence, P. J., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13910 · Cited by 768
Mueller, K. E., Tilman, D., Fornara, D. A., & Hobbie, S. E. (2013) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/12-1399.1 · Cited by 326
Direct and indirect control of grassland community structure by litter, resources, and biomass
Lamb, E. G. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0393.1 · Cited by 141
McNickle, G. G., & Brown, J. S. (2014) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12259 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHENK, H. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-24
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 725-739
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2169148530
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 129
- FWCI
- 16.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root competition: beyond resource depletion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01124.x
- The paper
- SCHENK, H. J. (2006). Root competition: beyond resource depletion. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01124.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.