Cited by 130Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyBiocrusts and Microbial EcologyProtist diversity and phylogeny

Matching molecular diversity and ecophysiology of benthic cyanobacteria and diatoms in communities along a salinity gradient

Nübel, Ulrich, Garcia‐Pichel, Ferran, Clavero, Ester, Muyzer, Gerard·2000·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

The phylogenetic diversity of oxygenic phototrophic microorganisms in hypersaline microbial mats and their distribution along a salinity gradient were investigated and compared with the halotolerances of closely related cultivated strains. Segments of 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria and diatom plastids were retrieved from mat samples by DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and subsequently analysed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Sequence analyses of DNA from individual DGGE bands suggested that the majority of these organisms was related to cultivated strains at levels that had previously been demonstrated to correlate with characteristic salinity responses. Proportional abundances of amplified 16S rRNA gene segments from phylogenetic groupings of cyanobacteria and diatoms were estimated by image analysis of DGGE gels and were generally found to correspond to abundances of the respective morphotypes determined by microscopic analyses. The results indicated that diatoms accounted for low proportions of cells throughout, that the cyanobacterium Microcoleus chthonoplastes and close relatives dominated the communities up to a salinity of 11% and that, at a salinity of 14%, the most abundant cyanobacteria were related to highly halotolerant cultivated cyanobacteria, such as the recently established phylogenetic clusters of Euhalothece and Halospirulina . Although these organisms in cultures had previously demonstrated their ability to grow with close to optimal rates over a wide range of salinities, their occurrence in the field was restricted to the highest salinities investigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00094.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nübel, U., Garcia‐Pichel, F., Clavero, E., & Muyzer, G.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology (DE)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Nübel, Ulrich
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-04
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
217-226
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2155959746
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
Keywords
benthic cyanobacteria, diatoms, hypersaline microbial mats, salinity gradient, halotolerance, 16S rRNA gene diversity, Microcoleus chthonoplastes, ecophysiology, community composition
MeSH terms
Cyanobacteria, DNA, Bacterial, Ecology, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Mexico, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sodium Chloride, Water Microbiology, Diatoms, DNA, Plant, RNA, Plant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review