The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioaugmentation of soils by increasing microbial richness: missing links
Abstract
Summary: It is generally assumed that increased microbial diversity corresponds to increased catabolic potential and, hence, to better removal of metabolites and pollutants. Yet, microbial diversity, more specifically richness of species in environmental samples and sites, is difficult to assess. It is proposed to interpret this diversity more in the framework of Pareto's law, i.e. 20% of the species govern 80% of the energy flux of the ecosystem. Ecological studies should attempt to delineate the main energy fluxes and that group of species playing quantitative key roles in the system. Consequently, bioaugmentation should aim at the rearrangement of the group of organisms dominantly involved in the overall energy flux, so that specific catabolic traits necessary for the clean up of pollutants are part of that active group. For soil ecosystems, the capacity of plant roots as creators of physical and chemical discontinuity should be used more strategically to bring about such rearrangements. Overall, this paper identifies a number of ecological concepts, such as the Pareto law, the Gompertz model and plant community‐induced microbial competence, which may, given careful underpinning, open new perspectives for microbial ecology and biodegradation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gompertz, B. (1825) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1825.0026 · Cited by 3,816
Cited by
Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Hättenschwiler, S., Tiunov, A. V., & Scheu, S. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932 · Cited by 1,674
Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities
O'Callaghan, M., Ballard, R. A., & Wright, D. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12811 · Cited by 489
Bioaugmentation and its application in wastewater treatment: A review
Herrero, M., & Stuckey, D. C. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.033 · Cited by 461
A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Pseudomonas putida KT2440: i JN746 as a cell factory
Nogales, J., Palsson, B. Ø., & Thiele, I. (2008) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-2-79 · Cited by 261
Mohamed, E. T., Werner, A. Z., Salvachúa, D., Singer, C. A., Szostkiewicz, K., Rafael Jiménez-Díaz, M., Eng, T., Radi, M. S., Simmons, B. A., Mukhopadhyay, A., et al. (2020) · Metabolic Engineering Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00143 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Dejonghe, W., Boon, N., Seghers, D., Top, E. M., & Verstraete, W.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 649-657
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W1972324845
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioaugmentation of soils by increasing microbial richness: missing links. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00236.x
- The paper
- Dejonghe, W., Boon, N., Seghers, D., Top, E. M., & Verstraete, W. (2001). Bioaugmentation of soils by increasing microbial richness: missing links. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00236.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.