The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhanced sensitivity of DNA‐ and rRNA‐based stable isotope probing by fractionation and quantitative analysis of isopycnic centrifugation gradients
Abstract
Summary: Stable isotope probing (SIP) of nucleic acids allows the detection and identification of active members of natural microbial populations that are involved in the assimilation of an isotopically labelled compound into nucleic acids. SIP is based on the separation of isotopically labelled DNA or rRNA by isopycnic density gradient centrifugation. We have developed a highly sensitive protocol for the detection of ‘light’ and ‘heavy’ nucleic acids in fractions of centrifugation gradients. It involves the fluorometric quantification of total DNA or rRNA, and the quantification of either 16S rRNA genes or 16S rRNA in gradient fractions by real‐time PCR with domain‐specific primers. Using this approach, we found that fully 13 C‐labelled DNA or rRNA of Methylobacterium extorquens was quantitatively resolved from unlabelled DNA or rRNA of Methanosarcina barkeri by cesium chloride or cesium trifluoroacetate density gradient centrifugation respectively. However, a constant low background of unspecific nucleic acids was detected in all DNA or rRNA gradient fractions, which is important for the interpretation of environmental SIP results. Consequently, quantitative analysis of gradient fractions provides a higher precision and finer resolution for retrieval of isotopically enriched nucleic acids than possible using ethidium bromide or gradient fractionation combined with fingerprinting analyses. This is a prerequisite for the fine‐scale tracing of microbial populations metabolizing 13 C‐labelled compounds in natural ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant host habitat and root exudates shape soil bacterial community structure
Haichar, F. E. Z., Marol, C., Berge, O., Rangel-Castro, J. I., Prosser, J. I., Balesdent, J., Heulin, T., & Achouak, W. (2008) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.80 · Cited by 1,161
Land-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities
Gossner, M. M., Lewinsohn, T. M., Kahl, T., Grassein, F., Boch, S., Prati, D., Birkhofer, K., Renner, S. C., Sikorski, J., Wubet, T., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20575 · Cited by 706
Unravelling rhizosphere–microbial interactions: opportunities and limitations
Singh, B. K., Millard, P., Whiteley, A. S., & Murrell, J. C. (2004) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.008 · Cited by 503
Autotrophic growth of nitrifying community in an agricultural soil
Xia, W., Zhang, C., Zeng, X., Feng, Y., Weng, J., Lin, X., Zhu, J., Xiong, Z., Xu, J., Cai, Z., et al. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.5 · Cited by 401
Kittelmann, S., Seedorf, H., Walters, W. A., Clemente, J. C., Knight, R., Gordon, J. I., & Janssen, P. H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047879 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Lueders, T., Manefield, M., & Friedrich, M. W.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-78
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W1615978956
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced sensitivity of DNA‐ and rRNA‐based stable isotope probing by fractionation and quantitative analysis of isopycnic centrifugation gradients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00536.x
- The paper
- Lueders, T., Manefield, M., & Friedrich, M. W. (2004). Enhanced sensitivity of DNA‐ and rRNA‐based stable isotope probing by fractionation and quantitative analysis of isopycnic centrifugation gradients. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00536.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.