The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decreased incidence of prostate cancer with selenium supplementation: results of a double‐blind cancer prevention trial
Abstract
Objective: To test if supplemental dietary selenium is associated with changes in the incidence of prostate cancer. Patients and method: A total of 974 men with a history of either a basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma were randomized to either a daily supplement of 200 μg of selenium or a placebo. Patients were treated for a mean of 4.5 years and followed for a mean of 6.5 years. Results: Selenium treatment was associated with a significant (63%) reduction in the secondary endpoint of prostate cancer incidence during 1983–93. There were 13 prostate cancer cases in the selenium‐treated group and 35 cases in the placebo group (relative risk, RR=0.37, P =0.002). Restricting the analysis to the 843 patients with initially normal levels of prostate‐specific antigen (≤4 ng/mL), only four cases were diagnosed in the selenium‐treated group and 16 cases were diagnosed in the placebo group after a 2 year treatment lag, (RR=0.26 P =0.009). There were significant health benefits also for the other secondary endpoints of total cancer mortality, and the incidence of total, lung and colorectal cancer. There was no significant change in incidence for the primary endpoints of basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. In light of these results, the ‘blinded’ phase of this trial was stopped early. Conclusions: Although selenium shows no protective effects against the primary endpoint of squamous and basal cell carcinomas of the skin, the selenium‐treated group had substantial reductions in the incidence of prostate cancer, and total cancer incidence and mortality that demand further evaluation in well‐controlled prevention trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199404143301501 · Cited by 4,737
Cited by
Kamangar, F., Dores, G. M., & Anderson, W. F. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.2308 · Cited by 3,434
Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors
Rock, C. L., Doyle, C., Demark‐Wahnefried, W., Meyerhardt, J., Courneya, K. S., Schwartz, A. L., Bandera, E. V., Hamilton, K. K., Grant, B., McCullough, M., et al. (2012) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21142 · Cited by 1,995
Selenium in global food systems
Combs, G. F. (2001) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn2000280 · Cited by 1,129
Doyle, C., Kushi, L. H., Byers, T., Courneya, K. S., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Grant, B., McTiernan, A., Rock, C. L., Thompson, C., Gansler, T., et al. (2006) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.56.6.323 · Cited by 950
Bjelakovic, G., Nikolova, D., Gluud, L. L., Simonetti, R. G., & Gluud, C. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007176.pub2 · Cited by 924
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, Dalkin, Krongrad, Jr, C., Turnbull, Slate, Witherington, Herlong, Janosko, Carpenter, Borosso, Falk, & Rounder
- Venue
- British Journal of Urology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 730-734
- ISSN
- 0007-1331 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010930508
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decreased incidence of prostate cancer with selenium supplementation: results of a double‐blind cancer prevention trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00630.x
- The paper
- Clark, Dalkin, Krongrad, Jr, C., Turnbull, Slate, Witherington, Herlong, Janosko, Carpenter, Borosso, Falk, & Rounder. (1998). Decreased incidence of prostate cancer with selenium supplementation: results of a double‐blind cancer prevention trial. British Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00630.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.