Cited by 950Cancer survivorship and careCancer Risks and FactorsNutritional Studies and Diet

Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: An American Cancer Society guide for informed choices

Open access
Doyle, C., Kushi, L. H., Byers, T., Courneya, K. S., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Grant, B., McTiernan, A., Rock, C. L. +4 more·2006·CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Abstract

Cancer survivors are often highly motivated to seek information about food choices, physical activity, and dietary supplement use to improve their treatment outcomes, quality of life, and survival. To address these concerns, the American Cancer Society (ACS) convened a group of experts in nutrition, physical activity, and cancer to evaluate the scientific evidence and best clinical practices related to optimal nutrition and physical activity after the diagnosis of cancer. This report summarizes their findings and is intended to present health care providers with the best possible information from which to help cancer survivors and their families make informed choices related to nutrition and physical activity. The report discusses nutrition and physical activity issues during the phases of cancer treatment and recovery, living after recovery from treatment, and living with advanced cancer; select nutrition and physical activity issues such as body weight, food choices, and food safety; issues related to select cancer sites; and common questions about diet, physical activity, and cancer survivorship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3322/canjclin.56.6.323

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review's findings are generally in agreement with the American Cancer Society, suggesting that moderate amounts of soy intake (up to 3 servings per day) are likely safe for consumption by women with breast cancer.

    “Our findings are generally in agreement with those of the American Cancer Society, suggesting that moderate amounts of soy intake (up to 3 servings per day) is likely safe for consumption by women with breast cancer [190].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doyle, C., Kushi, L. H., Byers, T., Courneya, K. S., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Grant, B., McTiernan, A., Rock, C. L., Thompson, C., Gansler, T., Andrews, K. S., & for the 2006 Nutrition, P. A. A. C. S. A. C.
Affiliations
  • American Cancer Society (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
323-353
ISSN
0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133037617
Cited by
950
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 72
FWCI
32.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
cancer survivorship, nutrition, physical activity, dietary supplements, cancer therapy, advanced cancer, body weight, food safety, food choice, quality of life
MeSH terms
American Cancer Society, Choice Behavior, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Motor Activity, Neoplasms, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, United States, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review