The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Family conflict, adherence, and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes
Abstract
Aims Behavioural support around diabetes management tasks is linked to glycaemic outcomes. In this study we investigated the relationship between diabetes‐related parental behaviours (conflict around and involvement in treatment tasks), adherence to blood glucose monitoring (BGM), and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods In a cross‐sectional study, 104 youth (aged 8–17 years, duration of Type 1 DM 0.5–6 years) along with a parent, completed the Diabetes Conflict Scale. Parental involvement in management tasks was assessed with structured interviews and the Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire. Adherence to BGM was evaluated by family report and by independent clinician rating. Glycaemic control was assessed with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA 1c) (ref. range, 4–6%). Results Children (8–12 years; n = 69) and adolescents (13–17 years; n = 35), respectively, had similar durations of diabetes (x ± sd; 2.7 ± 1.69, 2.4 ± 1.32 years) and similar glycaemic control (8.3 ± 1.1%, 8.4 ± 1.1%). In both age groups, parental involvement was a significant predictor of adherence to BGM (P = 0.01). Multivariate analyses, controlling for age, sex, disease duration, and BGM adherence, revealed that higher diabetes conflict significantly related to poorer glycaemic control (HbA 1c) (R2 = 0.17; P < 0.01). Conclusions These findings indicate that in this cohort, early in the course of diabetes, diabetes‐specific conflict and adherence to BGM became strongly linked to the child's glycaemic control. This suggests that to insure optimal control, it may be beneficial to introduce targeted interventions to build positive family involvement and interaction around diabetes tasks early in the disease course, before negative behaviours become established. Diabet. Med. 19, 635–642 (2002)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, B., Ho, J., Brackett, J., Finkelstein, D., & Laffel, L. (1997) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70352-4 · Cited by 531
Self-citation
Cited by
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0805017 · Cited by 1,559
Katsarou, A., Gudbjörnsdottir, S., Rawshani, A., Dabelea, D., Bonifacio, E., Anderson, B. J., Jacobsen, L. M., Schatz, D. A., & Lernmark, Å. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.16 · Cited by 1,475
Self-citationCare of Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
Silverstein, J., Klingensmith, G., Copeland, K., Plotnick, L., Kaufman, F., Laffel, L., Deeb, L., Grey, M., Anderson, B., Holzmeister, L. A., et al. (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.1.186 · Cited by 1,312
Self-citation14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-s014 · Cited by 367
Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis
Hood, K. K., Peterson, C. M., Rohan, J. M., & Drotar, D. (2009) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0207 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, B. J., Vangsness, L., Connell, A., Butler, D., Goebel‐Fabbri, A., & Laffel, L. M. B.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07-30
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 635-642
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2060528489
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Family conflict, adherence, and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00752.x
- The paper
- Anderson, B. J., Vangsness, L., Connell, A., Butler, D., Goebel‐Fabbri, A., & Laffel, L. M. B. (2002). Family conflict, adherence, and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00752.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.