Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Family conflict, adherence, and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes

Anderson, B. J., Vangsness, L., Connell, A., Butler, D., Goebel‐Fabbri, A., Laffel, L. M. B.·2002·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims Behavioural support around diabetes management tasks is linked to glycaemic outcomes. In this study we investigated the relationship between diabetes‐related parental behaviours (conflict around and involvement in treatment tasks), adherence to blood glucose monitoring (BGM), and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods In a cross‐sectional study, 104 youth (aged 8–17 years, duration of Type 1 DM 0.5–6 years) along with a parent, completed the Diabetes Conflict Scale. Parental involvement in management tasks was assessed with structured interviews and the Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire. Adherence to BGM was evaluated by family report and by independent clinician rating. Glycaemic control was assessed with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA 1c) (ref. range, 4–6%). Results Children (8–12 years; n = 69) and adolescents (13–17 years; n = 35), respectively, had similar durations of diabetes (x ± sd; 2.7 ± 1.69, 2.4 ± 1.32 years) and similar glycaemic control (8.3 ± 1.1%, 8.4 ± 1.1%). In both age groups, parental involvement was a significant predictor of adherence to BGM (P = 0.01). Multivariate analyses, controlling for age, sex, disease duration, and BGM adherence, revealed that higher diabetes conflict significantly related to poorer glycaemic control (HbA 1c) (R2 = 0.17; P < 0.01). Conclusions These findings indicate that in this cohort, early in the course of diabetes, diabetes‐specific conflict and adherence to BGM became strongly linked to the child's glycaemic control. This suggests that to insure optimal control, it may be beneficial to introduce targeted interventions to build positive family involvement and interaction around diabetes tasks early in the disease course, before negative behaviours become established. Diabet. Med. 19, 635–642 (2002)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00752.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, B. J., Vangsness, L., Connell, A., Butler, D., Goebel‐Fabbri, A., & Laffel, L. M. B.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07-30
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
635-642
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2060528489
Cited by
345
References
1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Family conflict, adherence, and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00752.x
The paper
Anderson, B. J., Vangsness, L., Connell, A., Butler, D., Goebel‐Fabbri, A., & Laffel, L. M. B. (2002). Family conflict, adherence, and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00752.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.