The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland
Abstract
ABSTRACT Aim Climate change has the potential to have significant impacts on the distribution of species and on the composition of habitats. This paper identifies the potential changes in the future distribution of species under the UKCIP98 climate change scenarios, in order that such changes can be taken into account in conservation management. Location The model was applied to Britain and Ireland. Methods A model based on an artificial neural network was used to predict the changing bioclimate envelopes of species in Britain and Ireland. Fifty‐four species representing 15 habitats were modelled. Results The modelled species could be placed into three categories: those losing suitable climate space, those gaining it, and those showing little or no change. When the species were associated with habitats it was found that Arctic–Alpine/montane heath communities were the most sensitive to climate change, followed by pine woodland and beech woodland in southern England. In lowland heath, wet heath, cereal field margins, coastal grazing marsh, drought‐prone acid grassland and calcareous grassland, the species either showed little change or an increase in suitable climate space. The other eight habitats showed a mixed response. Conclusions The species show a variety of responses to climate change and thus their current habitat associations may alter. The uncertain future of some species and habitats is highlighted. Conservation policy and practice will need to be revised in the face of climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bale, J. S., Masters, G. J., Hodkinson, I. D., Awmack, C., Bezemer, T. M., Brown, V. K., Butterfield, J., Buse, A., Coulson, J. C., Farrar, J., et al. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x · Cited by 2,775
Cited by
Pearson, R. G., & Dawson, T. P. (2003) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00042.x · Cited by 4,252
Self-citationSelecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions
Liu, C., Berry, P. M., Dawson, T. P., & Pearson, R. G. (2005) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x · Cited by 2,701
Self-citationHeino, J., Virkkala, R., & Toivonen, H. (2009) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2008.00060.x · Cited by 788
Empirical Analyses of Plant‐Climate Relationships for the Western United States
Rehfeldt, G. E., Crookston, N. L., Warwell, M. V., & Evans, J. S. (2006) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/507711 · Cited by 490
Uses and Requirements of Ecological Niche Models and Related Distributional Models
Peterson, A. T. (2006) · Biodiversity Informatics · doi:10.17161/bi.v3i0.29 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Berry, P. M., Dawson, T. P., Harrison, P. A., & Pearson, R. G.
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 453-462
- ISSN
- 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985618776
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00304.x
- The paper
- Berry, P. M., Dawson, T. P., Harrison, P. A., & Pearson, R. G. (2002). Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00304.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.