The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Informed consent is increasingly heralded as an ethical panacea, a tool to counter autocratic and paternalistic medical practices. Debate about the implementation of informed consent is constricted and polarised, centring on the right of individuals to be fully informed and to freely choose versus an autocratic, paternalistic practice that negates individual choice. A bioethical framework, based on a principle‐led form of reductive/deductive reasoning, dominates the current model of informed consent. Such a model tends to abstract the process of consent from its clinical and social setting. By fleshing out the social process involved when patients and healthy volunteer subjects consent to take part in clinical drug trials, this paper attempts to address the problem arising from the current ‘empty ethics’ model. My arguments are substantiated by qualitative interview data drawn from a study I conducted on the process of consent as experienced by participants in clinical drug trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Particularly when patients are facing dire situations, we cannot simply assume that an elicited choice will be actively and freely made based on careful consideration and adequate understanding of the information (27).”
From Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens (2016) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical Research
Freedman, B. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198707163170304 · Cited by 2,339
Beecher, H. K. (1966) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196606162742405 · Cited by 1,961
Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism
Rose, N. (1993) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149300000019 · Cited by 951
Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter
Lupton, D. A. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00353-x · Cited by 611
Donovan, J., Little, P., Mills, N., Smith, M., Brindle, L., Jacoby, A., Peters, T., Frankel, S., Neal, D., & Hamdy, F. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766 · Cited by 533
Informed Consent — Why Are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized?
Cassileth, B. R., Zupkis, R. V., Sutton-Smith, K., & March, V. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198004173021605 · Cited by 526
Snowdon, C., Garcia, J., & Elbourne, D. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00063-4 · Cited by 296
Anspach, R. R. (1993) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520353787 · Cited by 292
Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials
King, N. M. P. (2000) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00685.x · Cited by 226
The Human Genome Diversity Project
Reardon, J. (2001) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631201031003002 · Cited by 192
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Annas G., 1992, The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code, 10.1093/oso/9780195070422.001.0001 · DOI
- Beauchamp T., L, 1989, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- 10.4324/9780203393000 · DOI
- Blaxter M., 1996, Lay Beliefs about Drugs and Medicines and the Implications for Community Pharmacy
- Britten N., 1996, Modern Medicine: Lay Perspectives and Experiences
- Calnan M., 1987, Health and Illness: the Lay Perspective
- CERES (Consumers for Ethics in Research), 1999, CERES News, CERES, 24
- 10.1136/bmj.316.7136.1000 · DOI
- Dresser R., 2001, When Science Offers Salvation: Patient Advocacy and Research Ethics, 10.1093/oso/9780195143133.001.0001 · DOI
- Estey A., 1994, Are research subjects able to retain the information they are given during the consent process, Health Law Review, 3, 37
- Giddens A., 1990, The Consequences of Modernity
- Giddens A., 1992, Modernity and Self‐Identity
- ICH (International Conference for Harmonisation), 1998, Manual For Research Ethics Committees
- 10.1016/0197-2456(81)90019-2 · DOI
- Light D., 1998, Bioethics and Society
- Mueller M., 1997, The Sociology of Medical Science and Technology
- Pappworth M., 1967, Human Guinea Pigs
- Rose N., 1989, Governing the Soul
- Rose N., 1996, Foucault and Political Reason
- 10.1017/CBO9780511488856 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0197-2456(98)00049-X · DOI
- Spink J.D., 1980, Risk and Regulation in Medicine
- Sugarman J. McCrory D.C. Powell D.(1999)Empirical research on informed consent: an annotated bibliography A Hastings Center Report Special Supplement. · DOI
- Tobias J., 1998, Changing the British Medical Journal's position on informed consent would be counterproductive, British Medical Journal, 316, 1001
- Warnock M., 1998, Informed consent – a publisher's duty, British Medical Journal, 316, 1002
- Williams S.J., 1996, Modern Medicine: Lay Perspectives and Experiences
- Wolpe P., 1998, Bioethics and Society
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–350 of 350
Ethical and Social Issues in Clinical Genetics
Clarke, A. J. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-383834-6.00038-0 · Cited by 4
Toward Comprehension: Improving Informed Consent in Behavioral Genetic Research
Batchelder, Z. R. (2016) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-5290 · Cited by 1
“…populations such as racial minority groups and those living in poverty, which after being brought to light forced a shift in public awareness of ethical research practices and lead to the normalizing of collection of written consent in both clinical and research endeavors (Corrigan, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialInformed Consent and Clinical Trial Participation
Akrong, L., Horstman, K., & Arhinful, D. K. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137456038_2
Shim, M.-J., & Lim, Y. (2009) · doi:10.12793/jkscpt.2009.17.1.5 · Cited by 1
Embryo Transfer: A View from the United Kingdom
Franklin, S. (2008) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8611-3_6 · Cited by 1
“especially informed consent) is often rightly criticised as empty (Corrigan 2003) or as limited or as too narrowly, and individualistically, defined, it is, from another point of view, an increasingly important context of active deliberation and dialogue, and one in which patient input and public participation may pla…”
BackgroundPersonalized ethics: The emergence and the effects in prenatal testing
Meskus, M. (2012) · BioSocieties · doi:10.1057/biosoc.2012.27 · Cited by 78
Beyond the ‘therapeutic misconception’: Research, care and moral friction
Wadmann, S., & Hoeyer, K. (2014) · BioSocieties · doi:10.1057/biosoc.2013.37
Reubi, D. (2012) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/sth.2012.15
Sperling, D. (2017) · Medicine, Health care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-017-9751-8
Inside the gate: ethical responsibility without ethical approval in practitioner research
Billingsley, L. (2026) · Research in Post-Compulsory Education · doi:10.1080/13596748.2026.2739099
Gomes, M. M. S., & Buro, A. (2026) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-026-10640-x
Bavel, H. V., Hermans, A.-M., & de Boer, M. L. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine (1967) · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119792
Ou, L., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161261466912
Disiplinlerarası Alanlarda Katılımcı Gözlemin Bibliyometrik Analizi
Zerengök, D. (2026) · Ulusal Spor Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.30769/usbd.1917865
Wickramarathna, A., Kumara, S., Fernando, H., Lakchani, M., & Wijayasekara, A. (2026) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.70243
Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in the Field: Revelations Made in “Sticky Moments”
Sommers, R., Chenier, A., & Hathaway, A. (2026) · Symbolic interaction · doi:10.1002/symb.70044
Parental Consent Approaches for Newborn Whole-Genome Sequencing–Based Screening
Park, H., Lee, J., Yoo, W., & Kim, H. (2026) · Korean Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.35301/ksme.2026.29.1.15
Waitzman, R., & Abramowitz, M. (2026) · Indian Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.20529/ijme.2026.012
“Key questions relate to secondary use of clinical data, informed consent under emergency conditions, algorithmic bias, accountability, liability, and public trust [7, 8].”
Cannizzo, F., Newett, L., McWhirter, R., Newson, A., Warren, V., & Nicol, D. (2026) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-026-02018-9
Explanatory language in dental informed consent communication
Pysarenko, A., & Kostenko, V. (2025) · The Ukrainian Scientific Medical Youth Journal · doi:10.32345/usmyj.4(158).2025.172-183
“Informed consent has been a subject of extensive research across multiple disciplines, including medicine [1 – 3], law [4 – 6], nursing [7 – 9], bioethics [10 – 12], sociology [13 – 15], and psychology [16 – 18].”
[Adequacy of informed consent in clinical research: A descriptive cross-sectional study].
Monge-Muñoz, M. D., Rodríguez-Caravaca, G., & Del-Barrio-Fernández, J. L. (2024) · Journal of Healthcare Quality Research · doi:10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.12.001
Riom, L., Gouilhers, S., & Burton‐Jeangros, C. (2024) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439241276262 · Cited by 2
“For instance, Oonagh Corrigan (2003) states that the empowerment of participants has become an “ ethical panacea, ” conceived by bioethics as the only meaningful “ antidote ” to medical paternalism.”
McMurray, J. (2024) · Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale · doi:10.3167/saas.2024.320205
Person-centred data sharing: Empirical studies in private individuals’ attitudes
Pickering, B., Boniface, M., Roth, S., Baker, K., & Taylor, S. (2024) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.17330.1
“Such features are assumed to add credibility to a TRE and inform decisions to take part in research or donate data, but are only part of the story which in turn may suggest a reassessment of informed consent processes (Corrigan, 2003; Pickering, 2021; Sugarman et al., 2005; Wiles et al., 2007).”
Okukpon, P. O., Isah, E., Osagiede, E. F., Okoeguale, J., Omoregbe, I. N., & Osagiede, M. O. (2024) · International Journal of Recent Innovations in Medicine and Clinical Research · doi:10.18231/j.ijrimcr.2019.004
“It has progressively signaled an ethical panacea countering the possible menace of authoritarian and despotic practices [1].”
BackgroundCuijpers, F., Muntinga, M. E., Bakker, M., Dilaver, G., van den Hoven, M., & Verdonk, P. (2022) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab.15.2.04 · Cited by 1
D’Abramo, F., Bont, A., & Nüßlein, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.872211
“Similar concerns showed that an active engagement of patients participating in medical research is hardly realized through information and authorization sheets (Dawson, 2003), and that healthy or sick donors of biological samples and of personal data rarely have the chance to understand, through official documents, th…”
BackgroundOrfàli, K., & Vries, R. G. D. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119633808.ch5 · Cited by 1
Brear, M. (2020) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4757
“these assumptions, which are underpinned by positivist, Western/modernist worldviews, are unfounded (Bell, 2014; Corrigan, 2003; Geissler, 2013; Sabati, 2019).”
BackgroundSibanda, O. (2019) · Journal for Juridical Science · doi:10.18820/24150517/jjs44.i1.2
“111 For more on informed consent and ethics, see, in general, Corrigan 2003:768-792; Weijer 2000:344-361.”
BackgroundCan They Do That?: The Limits of Governmental Power over Medical Treatment
McLaughlin, P. (2017) · The Journal of legal medicine · doi:10.1080/01947648.2017.1385039
Ethics and Its Discontents: Evidence from Terrorism Research in North-Eastern Nigeria
Aghedo, I. (2017) · doi:10.22160/22035184/aras-2017-38-1/29-45
“Some have been totally dismissive of ethical frameworks, labelling them as ‘empty ethics’ (Corrigan, 2003) which “impose silly restrictions” (Schrag, 2011, p. 122).”
BackgroundOzoliņš, J. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107589834.014
Salzmann-Erikson, M., Persson, J., & Fallqvist, C. (2014) · Nordic journal of nursing research · doi:10.1177/010740831403400311
Informed Consent: Introduction to clinical consent
Bowman, D., Spicer, J., & Iqbal, R. (2011) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139057523.001
Vailly, J. (2011) · Partage du savoir · doi:10.3917/puf.vaill.2011.01.0309
Ethical Issues in Visual Psychological Anthropology
Lemelson, R., & Tucker, A. (2021) · Widening the Frame with Visual Psychological Anthropology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79883-3_9
Methodological Choices and Challenges
Minson, S. (2019) · Palgrave socio-legal studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32738-5_3
(Un-)Informed Consent? Regulating and Managing Fieldwork Encounters in Practice
Happ, D., Meyer, F., Miggelbrink, J., & Beurskens, K. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56277-2_2
Healthy Volunteering and Phase I Clinical Drug Trials in the UK
Mwale, S. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59214-5_1
Risk, Rewards, and Rational Consent in Healthy Volunteering
Mwale, S. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59214-5_2
Ethics Committees: Procedures and Duties
Koepsell, D. (2016) · SpringerBriefs in ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51277-8_7 · Cited by 1
Ciuccarelli, P., Lupi, G., & Simeone, L. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02195-9_5
Ubject Exchange as Everyday Practice
Hoeyer, K. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5264-1_4
PROPERTY REDUX. OWNERSHIP OF HUMAN TISSUE AND THE GOVERNANCE OF POST-GENOMIC RESEARCH BIOBANKS
Schmietow, B. (2014) · Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) · doi:10.13130/schmietow-bettina_phd2014-03-25
“…information as the primary enabling condition for respecting or even enhancing the consenting person’s autonomy have been critically 43 discussed in various real-world medicine and research contexts for some time (e.g. O’Neill 2003; Corrigan 2003; Manson and O’Neill 2007; Felt et al. 2009).”
BackgroundCompensation's effect on risk perception in behavioral genetic research
Batchelder, Z. R. (2012) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-1512
“However, even with such a long history underpinning it, researching informed consent for biomedical research is complex (Corrigan, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialHigh-risk, high-value: embryonic stem cells
Harvey, O. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781908818140.121
Metadata
- Authors
- Corrigan, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Corrigan, Oonagh
- ORCID
- Corrigan, Oonagh
- Venue
- Sociology of Health & Illness
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 768-792
- ISSN
- 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9566
- OpenAlex
- W2061123320
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 15.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Social Sciences › Law › Medical and Health Sciences Research
- Keywords
- informed consent, clinical drug trials, patient consent, paternalism, individual choice, bioethical principles, healthy volunteers, clinical ethics
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Choice Behavior, Clinical Trials as Topic, Decision Making, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Informed Consent, Interviews as Topic, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Perception, Drugs, Investigational, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Personal Autonomy, Bioethical Issues, Ethics, Clinical, Paternalism, Principle-Based Ethics, Ethics, Research, Narration, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
