Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An efficacy and safety analysis of Exelon® in Alzheimer’s disease patients with concurrent vascular risk factors

Kumar, V., Anand, R., Messina, J., Hartman, R., Veach, J.·2000·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the centrally acting cholinesterase inhibitor, rivastigmine tartrate, for patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease (AD) with or without concurrent vascular risk factors (VRF). Patients (45–90 years of age) were randomized to placebo (n = 235), low‐dose rivastigmine (1–4 mg/day, n = 233), or high‐dose rivastigmine (6–12 mg/day, n = 231) for 26 weeks. Efficacy measures included the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale‐Cognitive subscale (ADAS‐Cog), the Clinician’s Interview Based Impression of Change (CIBIC‐Plus), the Progressive Deterioration Scale (PDS), the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), and the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE). For efficacy and safety analysis, patients were categorized by baseline Modified Hachinski Ischemic Score (MHIS) for the determination of VRF (MHIS > 0: presence of VRF; MHIS = 0: absence of VRF). As early as 12 weeks, the mean change from the baseline ADAS‐Cog score was significantly different for those patients treated with high‐dose rivastigmine compared with placebo controls in both MHIS categories. However, the treatment difference between high‐dose rivastigmine and placebo at each time‐point was larger for patients with MHIS > 0. The proportion of responders was significantly greater in the high‐dose rivastigmine group for each level of improvement. No differences were noted between treatment groups regarding safety evaluations. Rivastigmine is effective in both categories of patients, and those with VRF experience greater clinical benefit (cognition, activities of daily living, and disease severity).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2000.00046.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, V., Anand, R., Messina, J., Hartman, R., & Veach, J.
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
159-169
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W2041523804
Cited by
159
References
3
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An efficacy and safety analysis of Exelon® in Alzheimer’s disease patients with concurrent vascular risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2000.00046.x
The paper
Kumar, V., Anand, R., Messina, J., Hartman, R., & Veach, J. (2000). An efficacy and safety analysis of Exelon® in Alzheimer’s disease patients with concurrent vascular risk factors. European Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2000.00046.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.