Cited by 534Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease.

Open access
Birks, Jacqueline S, Chong, Lee-Yee, Grimley Evans, John·2015·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease is the commonest cause of dementia affecting older people. One of the therapeutic strategies aimed at ameliorating the clinical manifestations of Alzheimer's disease is to enhance cholinergic neurotransmission in the brain by the use of cholinesterase inhibitors to delay the breakdown of acetylcholine released into synaptic clefts. Tacrine, the first of the cholinesterase inhibitors to undergo extensive trials for this purpose, was associated with significant adverse effects including hepatotoxicity. Other cholinesterase inhibitors, including rivastigmine, with superior properties in terms of specificity of action and lower risk of adverse effects have since been introduced. Rivastigmine has received approval for use in 60 countries including all member states of the European Union and the USA. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of rivastigmine for patients with dementia of Alzheimer's type. SEARCH METHODS: We searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group Specialized Register, on 2 March 2015 using the terms: Rivastigmine OR exelon OR ENA OR "SDZ ENA 713". ALOIS contains records of clinical trials identified from monthly searches of a number of major healthcare databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS), numerous trial registries and grey literature sources. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all unconfounded, double-blind, randomised, controlled trials in which treatment with rivastigmine was administered to patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type for 12 weeks or more and its effects compared with those of placebo in a parallel group of patients, or where two formulations of rivastigmine were compared. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author (JSB) applied the study selection criteria, assessed the quality of studies and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 13 trials met the inclusion criteria of the review. The trials had a duration of between 12 and 52 weeks. The older trials tested a capsule form with a dose of up to 12 mg/day. Trials reported since 2007 have tested continuous dose transdermal patch formulations delivering 4.6, 9.5 and 17.7 mg/day.Our main analysis compared the safety and efficacy of rivastigmine 6 to 12 mg/day orally or 9.5 mg/day transdermally with placebo.Seven trials contributed data from 3450 patients to this analysis. Data from another two studies were not included because of a lack of information and methodological concerns. All the included trials were multicentre trials and recruited patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease with a mean age of about 75 years. All had low risk of bias for randomisation and allocation but the risk of bias due to attrition was unclear in four studies, low in one study and high in two studies.After 26 weeks of treatment rivastigmine compared to placebo was associated with better outcomes for cognitive function measured with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) score (mean difference (MD) -1.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.21 to -1.37, n = 3232, 6 studies) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (MD 0.74; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.97, n = 3205, 6 studies), activities of daily living (SMD 0.20; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.27, n = 3230, 6 studies) and clinician rated global impression of changes, with a smaller proportion of patients treated with rivastigmine experiencing no change or a deterioration (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.80, n = 3338, 7 studies).Three studies reported behavioural change, and there were no differences compared to placebo (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.04; 95% CI -0.14 to 0.06, n = 1529, 3 studies). Only one study measured the impact on caregivers using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Caregiver Distress (NPI-D) scale and this found no difference between the groups (MD 0.10; 95% CI -0.91 to 1.11, n = 529, 1 study). Overall, participants who received rivastigmine were about twice as likely to withdraw from the trials (odds ratio (OR) 2.01, 95% CI 1.71 to 2.37, n = 3569, 7 studies) or to experience an adverse event during the trials (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.57, n = 3587, 7 studies). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Rivastigmine (6 to 12 mg daily orally or 9.5 mg daily transdermally) appears to be beneficial for people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. In comparisons with placebo, better outcomes were observed for rate of decline of cognitive function and activities of daily living, although the effects were small and of uncertain clinical importance. There was also a benefit from rivastigmine on the outcome of clinician's global assessment. There were no differences between the rivastigmine group and placebo group in behavioural change or impact on carers. At these doses the transdermal patch may have fewer side effects than the capsules but has comparable efficacy. The quality of evidence is only moderate for all of the outcomes reviewed because of a risk of bias due to dropou

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd001191.pub4

Cites

136 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 147 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Anand R, Gharabawi G, Enz A. Efficacy and safety results of the early phase studies with Exelon (ENA-713) in Alzheimer's Disease: an overview. Journal of Drug Development and Clinical Practice 1996;8(2):109-16.
  2. B104 {published data only} Anand R, Gharabawi G, Enz A. Efficacy and safety results of the early phase studies with Exelon (ENA-713) in Alzheimer's Disease: an overview. Journal of Drug Development and Clinical Practice 1996;8(2):109-16.
  3. Anand R, Messina J, Veach J, Hartman R. Effects of rivastigmine in patients with moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. Sixth International Stockholm/Springfield Symposium on Advances in Alzheimer Therapy; April 5-8, 2000; Stockholm, Sweden. 2000:199.
  4. Farlow M, Anand R, Messina J, Hartman R. Increased cognitive efficacy of rivastigmine in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease with co-existing vascular risk. Sixth International Stockholm/Springfield Symposium on Advances in Alzheimer Therapy; April 5-8, 2000; Stockholm, Sweden. 2000:206.
  5. Farlow M, Messina J, Anand R, Hartman R, Veach J. Dose dependent effect of rivastigmine on progression of cognitive deterioration in Alzheimer's disease. Sixth International Stockholm/Springfield Symposium on Advances in Alzheimer Therapy; April 5-8, 2000; Stockholm, Sweden. 2000. 2000:172.
  6. Kumar V, Messina J, Hartman R, Anand R. Long-term cognitive benefits of rivastigmine in Alzheimer's disease patients with vascular risk. Sixth International Stockholm/Springfield Symposium on Advances in Alzheimer Therapy; April 5-8, 2000; Stockholm, Sweden. 2000:215.
  7. Rösler M. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease: International randomised controlled trial [Erratum]. BMJ 2001; Vol. 322, issue 7300:1456.
  8. Rösler M, Dennler H, Retz W, Gastpar W. A double-blind placebo controlled study of ENA 713 in Alzheimer's disease (DAT). Pharmacopsychiatry 1997;30:212. [MEDLINE: SR-HANDSRCH]
  9. Vincent S, Andrews C, Lane R. Rivastigmine shows particular efficacy in Alzheimer patients with concomitant hypertension. Proceedings of the 7th International Geneva/Springfield Symposium on Advances in Alzheimer therapy, 2002 Apr 3-6, Geneva. 2002:253.
  10. Burns A, Spiegel R, Quarg P. Efficacy of rivastigmine in subjects with moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2004;19(3):243-9.
  11. Farlow M, Potkin S, Koumaras B, Veach J, Mirski D. Analysis of outcome in retrieved dropout patients in a rivastigmine vs placebo, 26-week, Alzheimer disease trial. Archives of Neurology 2003;60:843-8.
  12. Novartis. No title. Unpublished. Data provided by Novartis. No year. Novartis Pharmaceuticals. ADENA Programme. Unpublished Data 1998. B352 {published data only} Burns A, Spiegel R, Quarg P. Efficacy of rivastigmine in subjects with moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2004;19(3):243-9.
  13. Doraiswamy PM, Anand R, Hartman R. Cognitive effects of rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderate alzheimer's disease compared to those with moderately-severe to severe AD. Clinical Neuropschological Assessment 2000;1(6):12.
  14. Doraiswamy PM, Anand R, Hartman R. Long term cognitive effects in Alzheimer's disease patients stratified by vascular risk score and treated for 1 year with rivastigmine. Clinical Neuropschological Assessment 2000;1(6):14.
  15. Farlow M, Hake A, Messina J, Veach J, Anand R. The response of patients with Alzheimer's disease to rivastigmine treatment is predicted by the rate of disease progression. Neurology 2000; Vol. 54 Suppl 3:A469.
  16. Farlow M, Messina J, Anand R. Long term cognitive benefits associated with the use of rivastigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease results following two years of treatment. Proceedings of the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Geriatric Society and the American Federation for Aging Research; 2000 May 17-21, Nashville. 2000:172.
  17. Farlow M, Potkin S, Koumaras B, Veach J, Mirski D. Analysis of outcome in retrieved dropout patients in a rivastigmine vs placebo, 26-week, Alzheimer disease trial. Archives of Neurology 2003;60:843-8.
  18. Ferris S. Improving day to day functioning in patients with AD. Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the International Psychogeriatric Association; 1999 Aug 15-20, Vancouver. 1999:77.
  19. Krishnan KR, Dorasiswamy PM, Messina J, Veach J, ENA 713 B352 Study Group. Rivastigmine slows stage specific global deterioration in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1999;47:S3.
  20. Veach KR, Doraiswamy PM. Rivastigmine slows stage-specific global deterioration in Alzheimer's disease. Proceedings of the 152nd Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 1999 May 15-20, Washington DC. 1999. [MEDLINE: SR-HANDSRCH]
  21. IDEAL {published data only} Alva G, Grossberg G, Schmitt F, Olin J. Influence of rivastigmine on activities of daily living: item responder analyses targeting improvement and atability. Annals of Neurology 2009; Vol. 66:S49.
  22. Werber 2002 {published data only} Werber EA, Klein C, Rabey MJ. Evaluation of cholinergic treatment in demented by p300 evoked related potentials. The 8th conference on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, July 20-25, 2002, Stockholm, Sweden. 2002:442.
  23. Wilkinson 2002 {published data only} Bullock R, Passmore F, Potocnik F, Hock C. The tolerability, ease of use and efficacy of donepezil and rivastigmine in Alzheimer's disease patients: a 12-week, multinational, comparative study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2001;49(4):S19.
  24. Potocnik FC, Smith R, Passmore P, Hock C, Wilkinson D, Maud CM, Hopker S. Tolerability, ease of use, and efficacy of donepezil and rivastigmine in Alzheimer's disease patients. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 2001 May 5-10; New Orleans. 2001.
  25. Benton AL. Revised visual retention test. 4th Edition. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Association, 1974.
  26. Burns A, Spiegel R, Quarg P. Efficacy of rivastigmine in subjects with moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2004;19(3):243-9.
  27. Erkinjuntti T, Skoog I, Lane R, Andrews C. Rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease and concurrent hypertension. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2002;56:791-6.
  28. Homma A, Niina R, Ishii T, Hasegawa K. Development of a new rating scale for dementia in the elderly: Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS). Japanese Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 1991;2:1217-22.
  29. Reisberg B, Franssen E. Stage specific incidence of potentially remediable behavioral symptoms in aging and AD: a study of 120 patients using the BEHAVE-AD. Bulletin of Clinical Neuroscience 1989;54:95-112.
  30. ENA or "SDZ ENA 713").ti,ab. 13. *Cholinesterase Inhibitors/ 14. or/10-13 Feb 2013: 299 Jan 2014: 144 Rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease (Review) Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 15. 9 and 14 16. controlled trial.pt. 17. controlled clinical trial.pt. 18. .ab. 19. placebo.ab. 20. drug therapy.fs. 21. randomly.ab. 22. trial.ab. 23. groups.ab. 24. or/16-23 25. (animals not (humans and animals)).sh. 26. 24 not 25 27. 15 and 26 28
  31. exelon*.ti,ab. 12. (ENA or "SDZ ENA 713").ti,ab. 13. *Cholinesterase Inhibitors/ 14. or/10-13 15. 9 and 14 16. controlled trial.pt. 17. controlled clinical trial.pt. 18. .ab. 445 Rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease (Review) Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 19. placebo.ab. 20. drug therapy.fs. 21. randomly.ab. 22. trial.ab. 23. groups.ab. 24. or/16-23 25. (animals not (humans and animals)).sh. 26. 24 not 25 27. 15 and 26

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birks, J. S., Chong, L.-Y., & Grimley Evans, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Cochrane (GB)
  • University of Oxford; Division of Clinical Geratology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine; Radcliffe Infirmary Woodstock Road Oxford UK OX2 6HE
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
15-6
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2098999434
Cited by
534
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 28
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
rivastigmine, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, cholinesterase inhibitors, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, transdermal patch, oral dosage forms, cognitive function, functional status, adverse effects, hepatotoxicity, tacrine, placebo comparison, treatment efficacy and safety, older adults, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Rivastigmine, Alzheimer Disease, Carbamates, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Neuroprotective Agents, Phenylcarbamates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review