The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Therapeutic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function in Parkinson's disease patients
Abstract
Cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex is altered in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Therefore, modulation of cortical excitability by high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex might result in beneficial effects on motor functions in PD. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of rTMS of the motor cortex on motor functions in patients with PD. Thirty‐six unmedicated PD patients were included consecutively in this study. The patients were assigned in a randomized pattern to one of two groups, one group receiving real‐rTMS (suprathreshold 5‐Hz, 2000 pulses once a day for 10 consecutive days) and the second group receiving sham‐rTMS using closed envelopes. Total motor section of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), walking speed, and self‐assessment scale were performed for each patient before rTMS and after the first, fifth, 10th sessions, and then after 1 month. Evaluation of these measures was performed blindly without knowing the type of rTMS. anova for repeated measurements revealed a significant time effect for the total motor UPDRS, walking speed and self‐assessment scale during the course of the study in the group of patients receiving real‐rTMS (P = 0.0001, 0.001, and 0.002), while no significant changes were observed in the group receiving sham‐rTMS except in self‐assessment scale (P = 0.019). A 10‐day course of real‐rTMS resulted in statistically significant long‐term improvement of the motor functions in comparison with the sham‐rTMS. The rTMS could have a therapeutic role of for PD patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.17.5.427 · Cited by 12,107
Strafella, A. P., Paus, T., Barrett, J., & Dagher, A. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-15-j0003.2001 · Cited by 1,058
Cited by
Lefaucheur, J.-P., Aleman, A., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Brunelin, J., Di Lazzaro, V., Filipović, S. R., Grefkes, C., Hasan, A., Hummel, F. C., et al. (2020) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002 · Cited by 2,382
Lefaucheur, J.-P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Cantello, R. M., Cincotta, M., de Carvalho, M., De Ridder, D., et al. (2014) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021 · Cited by 2,119
Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols
Ziemann, U., Paulus, W., Nitsche, M. A., Pascual-Leone, A., Byblow, W. D., Berardelli, A., Siebner, H. R., Classen, J., Cohen, L. G., & Rothwell, J. C. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.006 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- Khedr, E. M., Farweez, H. M., & Islam, H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-27
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 567-572
- ISSN
- 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-1331
- OpenAlex
- W2058512752
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Therapeutic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function in Parkinson's disease patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00649.x
- The paper
- Khedr, E. M., Farweez, H. M., & Islam, H. (2003). Therapeutic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function in Parkinson's disease patients. European Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00649.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.