The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging carbapenemases in Gram-negative aerobes
Open accessAbstract
Carbapenemases may be defined as beta-lactamases that significantly hydrolyze at least imipenem or/and meropenem. Carbapenemases involved in acquired resistance are of Ambler molecular classes A, B, and D. Class A, clavulanic acid-inhibited carbapenemases are rare. They are either chromosomally encoded (NMC-A, Sme-1 to Sme-3, IMI-1) in Enterobacter cloacae and Serratia marcescens, or plasmid encoded, such as KPC-1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae and GES-2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the latter being a point-mutant of the clavulanic acid-inhibited extended-spectrum beta-lactamase GES-1. The class B enzymes are the most clinically significant carbapenemases. They are metalloenzymes of the IMP or VIM series. They have been reported worldwide but mostly from South East Asia and Europe. Metalloenzymes, whose genes are plasmid and integron located, hydrolyze virtually all beta-lactams except aztreonam. Finally, the class D carbapenemases are increasingly reported in Acinetobacter baumannii but compromise imipenem and meropenem susceptibility only marginally. The sources of the acquired carbapenemase genes remain unknown, as does the relative importance of the spread of epidemic strains as opposed to the spread of plasmid- or integron-borne genes. Because most of these carbapenemases confer only reduced susceptibility to carbapenems in Enterobacteriaceae, they may remain underestimated as a consequence of the lack of their detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yigit, H., Queenan, A. M., Anderson, G. J., Domenech-Sanchez, A., Biddle, J. W., Steward, C. D., Alberti, S., Bush, K., & Tenover, F. C. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.4.1151-1161.2001 · Cited by 1,639
Cited by
Bad Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE! An Update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Boucher, H. W., Talbot, G. H., Bradley, J. S., Edwards, J. E., Gilbert, D., Rice, L. B., Scheld, M., Spellberg, B., & Bartlett, J. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/595011 · Cited by 4,958
Three Decades of β-Lactamase Inhibitors
Drawz, S. M., & Bonomo, R. A. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00037-09 · Cited by 1,709
β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview
Bush, K., & Bradford, P. A. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a025247 · Cited by 1,412
Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: mechanisms and epidemiology
Poirel, L., & Nordmann, P. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01456.x · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationBacterial resistance to antibiotics: Enzymatic degradation and modification
WRIGHT, G. (2005) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2005.04.002 · Cited by 897
Metadata
- Authors
- Nordmann, P., & Poirel, L.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 321-331
- ISSN
- 1198-743X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1796585208
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging carbapenemases in Gram-negative aerobes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00401.x
- The paper
- Nordmann, P., & Poirel, L. (2002). Emerging carbapenemases in Gram-negative aerobes. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00401.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.