Cited by 39Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesNeurological Complications and SyndromesMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Uterine and spiral artery flow velocity waveforms in pregnancy-induced hypertension and/or intrauterine growth retardation

Murakoshi, T., Sekizuka, N., Takakuwa, K., Yoshizawa, H., Tanaka, K.·1996·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to characterize spiral artery flow velocity waveforms in normal pregnancies and pregnancies complicated by pregnancy-induced hypertension and/or intrauterine growth retardation, and to examine the diagnostic potential for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in complicated pregnancies compared with uterine and umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms. In this cross-sectional study, 160 normal and 43 complicated pregnancies were assessed by color and pulsed Doppler during 18-41 weeks of gestation. Flow velocity waveforms were obtained from the spiral, uterine and fetal umbilical arteries. In normal pregnancies, the resistance index of spiral artery flow velocity waveforms decreased significantly with advancing gestation (r = -0.256, p < 0.001). In abnormal pregnancies complicated by pregnancy-induced hypertension and/or intrauterine growth retardation, the incidence of adverse perinatal outcome was significantly higher in patients with abnormal spiral artery resistance indices than in patients with normal spiral artery resistance indices (p < 0.001). An abnormal spiral artery resistance index had a better diagnostic accuracy for adverse perinatal outcome (sensitivity 85.0%, specificity 91.3%, positive predictive value 89.5%, negative predictive value 87.5%, accuracy 88.4%) when compared with the resistance index of uterine and umbilical artery waveforms and presence of a diastolic notch of the uterine artery waveform. Color flow imaging facilitates the precise analysis of spiral artery flow velocity waveforms and provides more accurate information about the uteroplacental circulation in the evaluation of placental function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07020122.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murakoshi, T., Sekizuka, N., Takakuwa, K., Yoshizawa, H., & Tanaka, K.
Affiliations
Niigata University (JP)
Corresponding author
Murakoshi, T.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-02
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
122-128
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2062115892
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
uterine artery, umbilical artery, gestational hypertension, fetal growth restriction, resistance index, uteroplacental circulation, placental function, perinatal complications, color Doppler ultrasound, diastolic notch, complicated pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Vascular Resistance, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed, Placental Circulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review