The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy
Open accessAbstract
We describe new charts and tables for dating pregnancies derived from data collected in a study designed to enable the construction of these and charts of fetal size. This was a prospective study in which 663 fetuses seen in the routine ultrasound clinic in a London teaching hospital were scanned once only for the purpose of this study. We discuss the statistical methodology in detail and compare the new charts with other published charts. We suggest that the differences seen may be due to variation in study methodology. Copyright © 1997 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan
Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Berghella, V., Bilardo, C., Hernandez‐Andrade, E., Johnsen, S. L., Kalache, K., Leung, K. ‐., Malinger, G., Munoz, H., et al. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.8831 · Cited by 1,006
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of first‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan
(2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12342 · Cited by 621
Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination
Savitz, D. A., Terry, J. W., Dole, N., Thorp, J. M., Siega-Riz, A. M., & Herring, A. H. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2002.127601 · Cited by 437
Ultrasound‐based gestational‐age estimation in late pregnancy
Papageorghiou, A. T., Kemp, B., Stones, W., Ohuma, E. O., Kennedy, S. H., Purwar, M., Salomon, L. J., Altman, D. G., Noble, J. A., Bertino, E., et al. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15894 · Cited by 179
Self-citationMaternal psychological distress and fetal growth trajectories: The Generation R Study
Henrichs, J., Schenk, J. J., Roza, S. J., van den Berg, M. P., Schmidt, H. G., Steegers, E. A. P., Hofman, A., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Verhulst, F. C., & Tiemeier, H. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709990894 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Altman, D. G., & Chitty, L. S.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 174-191
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2061955571
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10030174.x
- The paper
- Altman, D. G., & Chitty, L. S. (1997). New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10030174.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
