The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zinc, lead and cadmium tolerance, uptake and accumulation by Typha latifolia
Open accessAbstract
summary: Zinc, lead and cadmium tolerance in four populations of Typha latifolia raised from seed collected from metal‐contaminated and uncontaminated sites were investigated. Metal concentrations in natural plant populations showed that Zn, Pb and Cd in the leaves were maintained at low levels (Zn: 22–122, Pb: 4.7–40 and Cd: 0.2–0.8 μg g−1 d. wt), although concentrations of these metals in the associated soil‐sediments (total concentrations of Zn: 86–3009, Pb: 26–18894 and Cd: 1.4–26 μg−1 d. wt) and in the roots (Zn: 46–946, Pb: 25–3628 and Cd: 1.0–17 μg g−1 d. wt) varied widely. Some differences were found between metal‐contaminated and uncontaminated populations in terms of metal uptake under controlled conditions. Seedlings from metal‐contaminated populations accumulated considerably more metals (up to nearly twice as much Zn and Pb and three times as much Cd) in roots than the uncontaminated population in a pot trial. In general, however, different populations of T. latifolia showed similar growth responses (the longest leaf elongation, the longest root elongation, shoot and root d. wt), metal uptake and indices of metal tolerance when seedlings were grown in the same metal treatment solutions or in the same metal‐contaminated media under laboratory conditions. The data do not support the hypothesis that populations from metal‐contaminated sites have evolved tolerance to Zn, Pb and Cd, but rather that T. latifolia shows constitutional tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accumulators and excluders ‐strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals
Baker, A. J. M. (1981) · Journal of Plant Nutrition · doi:10.1080/01904168109362867 · Cited by 2,233
Self-citationThe physiology of metal toxicity in plants
Foy, C. D., Chaney, R. L., & White, M. C. (1978) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.002455 · Cited by 2,170
Cited by
Sharma, P., & Dubey, R. S. (2005) · Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1590/s1677-04202005000100004 · Cited by 1,600
Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils
Wong, M. H. (2003) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00232-1 · Cited by 1,059
Self-citationWeis, J. S., & Weis, P. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.002 · Cited by 959
Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and uptake by plant species with phytoremediation potential
Nouri, J., Khorasani, N., Lorestani, B., Karami, M., Hassani, A. H., & Yousefi, N. (2009) · Environmental Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0028-2 · Cited by 344
Tripathi, R. D., Tripathi, P., Dwivedi, S., Kumar, A., Mishra, A., Chauhan, P. S., Norton, G. J., & Nautiyal, C. S. (2014) · Metallomics · doi:10.1039/c4mt00111g · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- YE, Z. H., BAKER, A. J. M., WONG, M. H., & WILLIS, A. J.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 469-480
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2141471216
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zinc, lead and cadmium tolerance, uptake and accumulation by Typha latifolia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00759.x
- The paper
- YE, Z. H., BAKER, A. J. M., WONG, M. H., & WILLIS, A. J. (1997). Zinc, lead and cadmium tolerance, uptake and accumulation by Typha latifolia. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00759.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.