Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial differences in acquisition of soil phosphate between two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis with Medicago truncatula

Open access
SMITH, F. A., JAKOBSEN, I., SMITH, S. E.·2000·New Phytologist

Abstract

Responses of Medicago truncatula to colonization by two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Scutellospora calospora isolate WUM 12(2) and Glomus caledonium isolate RIS 42, were compared in the light of previous findings that the former fungus can be ineffective as a beneficial microsymbiont with some host plants. The plants were grown individually in two‐compartment systems in which a lateral side arm containing soil labelled with 33 P was separated from the main soil compartment by a nylon mesh that prevented penetration by roots but not fungal hyphae. Fungal inoculum was applied as a root–soil mixture in a band opposite the side arm. Nonmycorrhizal controls were set up similarly, without inoculum. There were harvests at 28, 35, 42 and 49 d. Both sets of mycorrhizal plants grew better than nonmycorrhizal plants and initially had higher concentrations of P in shoots and roots. Plants grown with S. calospora grew better than plants grown with G. caledonium, and this was associated with somewhat greater fungal colonization in terms of intraradical hyphae and numbers of arbuscules. Scutellospora calospora formed denser hyphae at root surfaces than G. caledonium. By 28 d there were extensive hyphae of both fungi in the side arms, and after 35 d S. calospora produced denser hyphae there than G. caledonium. Nevertheless, there was very little transfer of 33 P via S. calospora to the plant at 28 d, and thereafter its transfer increased at a rate only c. 33% of that via G. caledonium. The results showed that plants colonized by S. calospora preferentially obtained P from sites in the main soil chamber relatively close to the roots, compared with plants colonized by G. caledonium. Hence formation of a highly beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis does not necessarily depend on development of hyphae at a distance from the roots or on large‐scale translocation of P from distant sites. The results are discussed in relation to previous studies with compartmented systems that have involved the same fungi. Possible causes of the variable effects of S. calospora in symbiosis with different host plants are briefly assessed. Differences in spatial abilities of individual arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to acquire P might have strong ecological implications for plant growth in soils low in P.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00695.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
SMITH, F. A., JAKOBSEN, I., & SMITH, S. E.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-08
Volume
147
Issue
2
Pages
357-366
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2162505669
Cited by
284
References
14
FWCI
22.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial differences in acquisition of soil phosphate between two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis with Medicago truncatula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00695.x
The paper
SMITH, F. A., JAKOBSEN, I., & SMITH, S. E. (2000). Spatial differences in acquisition of soil phosphate between two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis with Medicago truncatula. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00695.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.