Ecotypic variation in selenium accumulation among populations of Stanleya pinnata
Abstract
• Ecotypic variation in selenium (Se) hyperaccumulation in plants is reported here among populations of Stanleya pinnata (Brassicaceae), which has a broad biogeographical range in the western USA. • In a glasshouse study, Se and sulfur accumulation were examined in 16 populations of S. pinnata. Plants grown from seed (collected from sites representing the species range) were subjected to five treatments differing in selenate (SeO 42−) and sulfate (SO 42−) concentrations. • The populations differed in shoot Se concentration by 1.4‐ to 3.6‐fold, depending on the treatment, and these concentrations were positively correlated with the indigenous soil Se levels at the collection sites. Shoot S concentrations varied by less than two‐fold, and did not correlate with the shoot Se levels. All populations accumulated SeO 42− preferentially over SO 42−. By contrast, Brassica juncea seedlings grown in a similar solution series consistently accumulated SO 42− preferentially over SeO 42−. Biomass production differed up to three‐fold between populations. • S. pinnata is a primary Se accumulator, but populations exhibit significant ecotypic differences in Se accumulation. Environmental concerns about Se are common, and the broad adaptation of S. pinnata makes it an attractive candidate for phytoremediation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selenate uptake by hyperaccumulators is not inhibited by high sulfate concentration.
“Furthermore, selenate uptake by hyperaccumulators is not inhibited by high sulfate concentration [220,221,222]”
From Selenium Cycling Across Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Interfaces: A Critical Review (2015) · cites this paper as [221]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Feist, L. J., & Parker, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Corresponding author
- Parker, David R.
- ORCID
- Parker, David R.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-69
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2042004190
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Selenium in Biological Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
- Keywords
- Stanleya pinnata, selenium hyperaccumulation, ecotypic variation, selenate, sulfate, sulfur accumulation, soil selenium, Brassica juncea, phytoremediation, plant adaptation, Brassicaceae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review