The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary dynamics of grass genomes
Abstract
Summary: The grass family (Poaceae) has been the subject of intense research over the past decade. Although other angiosperm families contain more species and more genera, the Poaceae exceed all other families in ecological dominance and economic importance. Research has focused on the evolutionary relationships among grasses as well as the structure of grass genomes. Here I examine the evolutionary dynamics of grass genomes in a phylogenetic framework. It is clear that grass genomes are evolutionarily labile for many characteristics, including genome size and chromosome number. Variation in genome size among grasses probably reflects fluctuations in the amount of repetitive DNA per genome, but the history and causes of chromosome number changes remain unclear. Despite substantial variation among genomes, comparative maps suggest that grass genomes retain extensive regions of colinearity. By reanalyzing some comparative map data and also by reviewing comparative sequence data, I argue that the current colinearity paradigm requires reassessment. Contents Summary 15 I. Introduction 16 II. Grass relationships, chromosome numbers and genome size 17 1. Grass relationships 17 2. The timescale of grass evolution 17 3. The evolution of chromosome number 18 4. The evolution of genome size 19 III. Comparative maps and sequencing 21 1. Comparative maps of the grasses 21 2. Limitations of map data for evolutionary analyses 22 3. Synteny among grass genomes: a reanalysis 23 4. Microsynteny: comparative grass sequences 24 IV. Conclusions 25 Acknowledgements 26 References 26
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Chromosomal evolution in higher plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,074
Wolfe, K. H., Li, W. H., & Sharp, P. M. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.24.9054 · Cited by 2,317
Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms
Bennett, M. D., & Smith, J. B. (1976) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0044 · Cited by 1,712
Genome evolution in polyploids
Wendel, J. F. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006392424384 · Cited by 1,600
Nested Retrotransposons in the Intergenic Regions of the Maize Genome
SanMiguel, P., Tikhonov, A., Jin, Y.-K., Motchoulskaia, N., Zakharov, D., Melake-Berhan, A., Springer, P. S., Edwards, K. J., Lee, M., Avramova, Z., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5288.765 · Cited by 1,401
A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy.
Sanderson, M. J. (1997) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025731 · Cited by 1,156
The Origins of Genomic Duplications in Arabidopsis
Vision, T. J., Brown, D. G., & Tanksley, S. D. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5499.2114 · Cited by 1,038
Song, K., Lu, P., Tang, K., & Osborn, T. C. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.17.7719 · Cited by 1,019
The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize
SanMiguel, P., Gaut, B. S., Tikhonov, A., Nakajima, Y., & Bennetzen, J. L. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/1695 · Cited by 998
Self-citation
Cited by
The Genomes of Oryza sativa: A History of Duplications
Yu, J., Wang, J., Lin, W., Li, S., Li, H., Zhou, J., Ni, P., Dong, W., Hu, S., Zeng, C., et al. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030038 · Cited by 983
Genomics-assisted breeding for crop improvement
VARSHNEY, R., GRANER, A., & SORRELLS, M. (2005) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.10.004 · Cited by 744
The ABC’s of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes
Schranz, M. E., Lysak, M. A., & Mitchell-Olds, T. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.002 · Cited by 575
Plant terpenes: defense responses, phylogenetic analysis, regulation and clinical applications
Singh, B., & Sharma, R. A. (2015) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-014-0220-2 · Cited by 562
Kramer, E. M., Jaramillo, M. A., & Di Stilio, V. S. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/166.2.1011 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaut, B. S.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-28
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2168967550
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 21.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary dynamics of grass genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00352.x
- The paper
- Gaut, B. S. (2002). Evolutionary dynamics of grass genomes. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00352.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.