The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa differing in response to nitrogen deposition also differ in pure culture organic nitrogen use and natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes
Abstract
• Ectomycorrhizal fungal species vary in their response to nitrogen (N) availability and ability to use organic N. We hypothesized that taxa dominant at sites with high soil inorganic N would be less likely to use organic N than taxa dominant at low soil inorganic N. We also asked whether these taxa differed in natural abundance of N isotopes. • Pure culture N use for taxa from an N deposition gradient in Alaska was examined and N isotopes of sporocarps, soils and foliage collected over this gradient were quantified. • Taxa common in low inorganic N soils grew on protein, glutamine and serine, whereas dominant taxa in high inorganic N soils grew on glutamine, but poorly on protein and serine. Sporocarp δ15N was highest in protein users, and lowest in nonprotein users. With increasing soil inorganic N, sporocarps became more isotopically enriched relative to foliage. • The importance of organic N use might decline with increasing N availability, although field tests are required. The relationship between organic N use and N isotopes also merits further study. However, sporocarp isotopic enrichment may be a useful indicator of soil N availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consequences of changing biodiversity
Chapin III, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012241 · Cited by 4,282
Cited by
Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Hättenschwiler, S., Tiunov, A. V., & Scheu, S. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932 · Cited by 1,674
Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems – a journey towards relevance?
Read, D. J., & Perez‐Moreno, J. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00704.x · Cited by 1,613
Tedersoo, L., May, T. W., & Smith, M. E. (2010) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x · Cited by 1,016
Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome
Peay, K. G., Kennedy, P. G., & Talbot, J. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59 · Cited by 721
Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land
Treseder, K. K., & Lennon, J. T. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00001-15 · Cited by 625
Metadata
- Authors
- Lilleskov, E. A., Hobbie, E. A., & Fahey, T. J.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-231
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2125229526
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa differing in response to nitrogen deposition also differ in pure culture organic nitrogen use and natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00367.x
- The paper
- Lilleskov, E. A., Hobbie, E. A., & Fahey, T. J. (2002). Ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa differing in response to nitrogen deposition also differ in pure culture organic nitrogen use and natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00367.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.