The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems – a journey towards relevance?
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Progress towards understanding the extent to which mycorrhizal fungi are involved in the mobilization of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from natural substrates is reviewed here. While mycorrhiza research has emphasized the role of the symbiosis in facilitation of capture of these nutrients in ionic form, attention has shifted since the mid‐1980s to analysing the mycorrhizal fungal abilities to release N and P from the detrital materials of microbial faunal and plant origins, which are the primary sources of these elements in terrestrial ecosystems. Ericoid, and some ectomycorrhizal fungi have the potential to be directly involved in attack both on structural polymers, which may render nutrients inaccessible, and in mobilization of N and P from the organic polymers in which they are sequestered. The advantages to the plant of achieving intervention in the microbial mobilization–immobilization cycles are stressed. While the new approaches may initially lack the precision achieved in studies of readily characterized ionic forms of N and P, they do provide insights of greater ecological relevance. The results support the hypothesis that selection has favoured ericoid and ectomycorrhizal systems with well developed saprotrophic capabilities in those ecosystems characterized by retention of N and P as organic complexes in the soil. The need for further investigation of the abilities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to intervene in nutrient mobilization processes is stressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x · Cited by 1,431
Untapped potential: exploiting fungi in bioremediation of hazardous chemicals
Harms, H., Schlosser, D., & Wick, L. Y. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2519 · Cited by 1,111
Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest
Lindahl, B. D., Ihrmark, K., Boberg, J., Trumbore, S. E., Högberg, P., Stenlid, J., & Finlay, R. D. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01936.x · Cited by 965
Phillips, R. P., Finzi, A. C., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Read, D. J., & Perez‐Moreno, J.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 475-492
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1993455386
- Cited by
- 1,613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems – a journey towards relevance? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00704.x
- The paper
- Read, D. J., & Perez‐Moreno, J. (2003). Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems – a journey towards relevance? New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00704.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.