The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The costs of reproduction in plants
Abstract
Summary: This review reports on the processes associated with costs of reproduction, including some theoretical considerations, definitions and methodological aspects, followed by a list of the situations where costs are difficult to find. Despite some exceptions, case studies, examined by trade‐offs between reproduction and other life‐history traits, generally support the predictions of the cost of reproduction hypothesis. The cost of reproduction as an evolutionary determinant of sexual dimorphism in life history traits in dioecious species was specifically tested, considering that the higher cost of reproduction in females has driven the life history traits related to sexual dimorphism. Females of woody dioecious species were consistently smaller than males supporting the costs of reproduction hypothesis. By contrast, females of herbaceous perennials were generally the larger sex, which did not fit the expectations of the hypothesis. Finally, the mechanisms that enable the compensation of the reproductive costs are detailed, including the plastic responses of photosynthesis and growth, the effects of the timing of investment, plant architecture and plant physiological integration. Contents Summary 321 I. Introduction 321 II. Theory on costs of reproduction 322 III. Methodological aspects 324 IV. Empirical evidence 328 V. Plant size and costs of reproduction 330 VI. Costs of reproduction in sexually dimorphic plants 331 VII. Compensation of the costs 333 VIII. Concluding comments and future perspectives 336 Acknowledgements 337 References 337
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
The Evolution of Life-histories
Benton, T. G., & Stearne, S. C. (1993) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5403 · Cited by 12,228
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Andersson, M. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207278 · Cited by 7,401
Trenbath, B., & Harper, J. L. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402622 · Cited by 6,942
Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2)
Levins, R. (1968) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691209418 · Cited by 5,302
The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend
Herms, D. A., & Mattson, W. J. (1992) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/417659 · Cited by 4,262
Effects of Size and Temperature on Metabolic Rate
Gillooly, J. F., Brown, J. H., West, G. B., Savage, V. M., & Charnov, E. L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1061967 · Cited by 3,810
Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas
Stearns, S. C. (1976) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409052 · Cited by 3,557
The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-4983 · Cited by 3,433
Metadata
- Authors
- Obeso, J. R.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08-20
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 321-348
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2149139127
- Cited by
- 1,377
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The costs of reproduction in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x
- The paper
- Obeso, J. R. (2002). The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.