The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Phosphorus (P) is limiting for crop yield on > 30% of the world's arable land and, by some estimates, world resources of inexpensive P may be depleted by 2050. Improvement of P acquisition and use by plants is critical for economic, humanitarian and environmental reasons. Plants have evolved a diverse array of strategies to obtain adequate P under limiting conditions, including modifications to root architecture, carbon metabolism and membrane structure, exudation of low molecular weight organic acids, protons and enzymes, and enhanced expression of the numerous genes involved in low‐P adaptation. These adaptations may be less pronounced in mycorrhizal‐associated plants. The formation of cluster roots under P‐stress by the nonmycorrhizal species white lupin (Lupinus albus), and the accompanying biochemical changes exemplify many of the plant adaptations that enhance P acquisition and use. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular studies of white lupin and other species response to P‐deficiency have identified targets that may be useful for plant improvement. Genomic approaches involving identification of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) found under low‐P stress may also yield target sites for plant improvement. Interdisciplinary studies uniting plant breeding, biochemistry, soil science, and genetics under the large umbrella of genomics are prerequisite for rapid progress in improving nutrient acquisition and use in plants. Contents I. Introduction 424 II. The phosphorus conundrum 424 III. Adaptations to low P 424 IV. Uptake of P 424 V. P deficiency alters root development and function 426 VI. P deficiency modifies carbon metabolism 431 VII. Acid phosphatase 436 VIII. Genetic regulation of P responsive genes 437 IX. Improving P acquisition 439 X. Synopsis 440
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vance, C. P. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.010331 · Cited by 899
Self-citation
Cited by
Raghothama, K. G., & Karthikeyan, A. S. (2005) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-004-2005-6 · Cited by 1,640
Li, L., Li, S.-M., Sun, J.-H., Zhou, L.-L., Bao, X.-G., Zhang, H.-G., & Zhang, F.-S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704591104 · Cited by 937
Root phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: an underexploited opportunity for global agriculture
Lynch, J. P. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15738 · Cited by 774
Performance and prospects of different adsorbents for phosphorus uptake and recovery from water
Bacelo, H., Pintor, A. M. A., Santos, S. C. R., Boaventura, R. A. R., & Botelho, C. M. S. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122566 · Cited by 620
Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review
Niu, Y. F., Chai, R. S., Jin, G. L., Wang, H., Tang, C. X., & Zhang, Y. S. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs285 · Cited by 617
Metadata
- Authors
- Vance, C. P., Uhde‐Stone, C., & Allan, D. L.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423-447
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2158752909
- Cited by
- 3,014
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x
- The paper
- Vance, C. P., Uhde‐Stone, C., & Allan, D. L. (2003). Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.