The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Horizontal gene transfer in the phytosphere
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Here, the ecological aspects of gene transfer processes between bacteria in the phytosphere are examined in the context of emerging evidence for the dominant role that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) has played in the evolutionary shaping of bacterial communities. Moreover, the impact of the putative capture of genetic material by bacteria from plants is discussed. Examples are provided that illustrate how mobile genetic elements (MGEs) influence the behaviour of bacteria in their natural habitat, especially in structured communities such as biofilms on plant surfaces. This community behaviour is used as a framework to pose questions on the evolutionary role and significance of gene transfer processes in plant‐associated habitats. Selection within the highly structured phytosphere is likely to represent a dominant force shaping the genetic make‐up of plant‐associated bacterial communities. Current understanding of the triggering and impact of horizontal gene transfer, however, remains limited by our lack of understanding of the nature of the selective forces that act on bacteria in situ. The individual, colony, population and community level selection benefits imposed by the ability to use specific carbon sources or survive selective compounds are clear, but it is not always possible to assess what drives gene transfer and persistence. The role of HGT in the adaptation of host bacteria to their environmental niche is still not fully understood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation
Ochman, H., Lawrence, J. G., & Groisman, E. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012500 · Cited by 3,816
Cited by
Fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics in soil
Jechalke, S., Heuer, H., Siemens, J., Amelung, W., & Smalla, K. (2014) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2014.05.005 · Cited by 577
Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance from animal manures to soil: a review
Xie, W. ‐., Shen, Q., & Zhao, F. J. (2018) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.12494 · Cited by 437
Antibiotic Resistomes in Plant Microbiomes
Chen, Q.-L., Cui, H.-L., Su, J.-Q., Penuelas, J., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.010 · Cited by 391
Antibiotic resistome in the livestock and aquaculture industries: Status and solutions
Zhao, Y., Yang, Q. E., Zhou, X., Wang, F.-H., Muurinen, J., Virta, M. P., Brandt, K. K., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2020.1777815 · Cited by 299
Thijs, S., Sillen, W., Rineau, F., Weyens, N., & Vangronsveld, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00341 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Elsas, J. D., Turner, S., & Bailey, M. J.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 525-537
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2101266477
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Horizontal gene transfer in the phytosphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00697.x
- The paper
- Van Elsas, J. D., Turner, S., & Bailey, M. J. (2003). Horizontal gene transfer in the phytosphere. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00697.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.