The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards an Enhanced Understanding of Plant–Microbiome Interactions to Improve Phytoremediation: Engineering the Metaorganism
Open accessAbstract
Phytoremediation is a promising technology to clean-up contaminated soils based on the synergistic actions of plants and microorganisms. However, to become a widely accepted, and predictable remediation alternative, a deeper understanding of the plant-microbe interactions is needed. A number of studies link the success of phytoremediation to the plant-associated microbiome functioning, though whether the microbiome can exist in alternative, functional states for soil remediation, is incompletely understood. Moreover, current approaches that target the plant host, and environment separately to improve phytoremediation, potentially overlook microbial functions and properties that are part of the multiscale complexity of the plant-environment wherein biodegradation takes place. In contrast, in situ studies of phytoremediation research at the metaorganism level (host and microbiome together) are lacking. Here, we discuss a competition-driven model, based on recent evidence from the metagenomics level, and hypotheses generated by microbial community ecology, to explain the establishment of a catabolic rhizosphere microbiome in a contaminated soil. There is evidence to ground that if the host provides the right level and mix of resources (exudates) over which the microbes can compete, then a competitive catabolic and plant-growth promoting (PGP) microbiome can be selected for as long as it provides a competitive superiority in the niche. The competition-driven model indicates four strategies to interfere with the microbiome. Specifically, the rhizosphere microbiome community can be shifted using treatments that alter the host, resources, environment, and that take advantage of prioritization in inoculation. Our model and suggestions, considering the metaorganism in its natural context, would allow to gain further knowledge on the plant-microbial functions, and facilitate translation to more effective, and predictable phytotechnologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754 · cited 5×
“To ground the competition model further, we refer to the ideas of Grime (1977), who suggested three primary strategies of viable plant habitats.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere
Philippot, L., Raaijmakers, J. M., Lemanceau, P., & van der Putten, W. H. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3109 · Cited by 3,883
Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome
Lundberg, D. S., Lebeis, S. L., Paredes, S. H., Yourstone, S., Gehring, J., Malfatti, S., Tremblay, J., Engelbrektson, A., Kunin, V., Rio, T. G. D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11237 · Cited by 2,879
Mendes, R., Garbeva, P., & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12028 · Cited by 2,820
Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle
Hibbing, M. E., Fuqua, C., Parsek, M. R., & Peterson, S. B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2259 · Cited by 2,689
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
Berg, G., & Smalla, K. (2009) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x · Cited by 2,264
Pilon-Smits, E. (2005) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144214 · Cited by 2,020
Diet Drives Convergence in Gut Microbiome Functions Across Mammalian Phylogeny and Within Humans
Muegge, B. D., Kuczynski, J., Knights, D., Clemente, J. C., González, A., Fontana, L., Henrissat, B., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198719 · Cited by 1,988
Cited by
The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Mitigating Plant’s Environmental Stresses
Vocciante, M., Grifoni, M., Fusini, D., Petruzzelli, G., & Franchi, E. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12031231 · Cited by 316
Raklami, A., Meddich, A., Oufdou, K., & Baslam, M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23095031 · Cited by 283
Hoang, S. A., Lamb, D., Seshadri, B., Sarkar, B., Choppala, G., Kirkham, M. B., & Bolan, N. S. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123282 · Cited by 189
Bolan, N., Sarkar, B., Vithanage, M., Singh, G., Tsang, D. C. W., Mukhopadhyay, R., Ramadass, K., Vinu, A., Sun, Y., Ramanayaka, S., et al. (2021) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106600 · Cited by 185
Engineering PGPMOs through Gene Editing and Systems Biology: A Solution for Phytoremediation?
Basu, S., Rabara, R. C., Negi, S., & Shukla, P. (2018) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.01.011 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Thijs, S., Sillen, W., Rineau, F., Weyens, N., & Vangronsveld, J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-03-16
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 341-341
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2306477473
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 128
- FWCI
- 12.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards an Enhanced Understanding of Plant–Microbiome Interactions to Improve Phytoremediation: Engineering the Metaorganism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00341
- The paper
- Thijs, S., Sillen, W., Rineau, F., Weyens, N., & Vangronsveld, J. (2016). Towards an Enhanced Understanding of Plant–Microbiome Interactions to Improve Phytoremediation: Engineering the Metaorganism. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.