The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rhizobacterial effects on nickel extraction from soil and uptake by Alyssum murale
Open accessAbstract
• Alyssum murale has a remarkable ability to hyperaccumulate Ni from soils containing mostly nonlabile Ni. Here, rhizobacteria are shown to play an important role in increasing the availability of Ni in soil, thus enhancing Ni accumulation by A. murale. • Three bacteria, originally isolated from the rhizosphere of A. murale, were examined for their ability to solubilize Ni in soil and for their effect on Ni uptake into Alyssum. Sphingomonas macrogoltabidus, Microbacterium liquefaciens, and Microbacterium arabinogalactanolyticum were added to both sterile and nonsterile Ni-rich Serpentine soil from OR, USA. • Sphingomonas macrogoltabidus significantly reduced Ni extraction by 10 mM Sr(NO3)2 from soil, M. arabinogalactanolyticum significantly increased Ni extraction, whereas M. liquefaciens had no effect. Extractability of few other metals was affected by inoculation. When these bacteria were added to surface-sterilized seeds of A. murale grown in nonsterile soil, they increased Ni uptake into the shoot by 17% (S. macrogoltabidus), 24% (M. liquefaciens), and 32.4% (M. arabinogalactanolyticum), compared with uninoculated controls. • These results show that bacteria are important for Ni uptake, which from a commercial perspective, could significantly increase revenue generated during phytomining of Ni from soil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal tolerance and hyperaccumulation: Costs and trade-offs between traits and environment
Maestri, E., Marmiroli, M., Visioli, G., & Marmiroli, N. (2010) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.10.011 · Cited by 538
Trace element behaviour at the root–soil interface: Implications in phytoremediation
Kidd, P., Barceló, J., Bernal, M. P., Navari-Izzo, F., Poschenrieder, C., Shilev, S., Clemente, R., & Monterroso, C. (2009) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.013 · Cited by 395
Biochar and Manure Affect Calcareous Soil and Corn Silage Nutrient Concentrations and Uptake
Lentz, R. D., & Ippolito, J. A. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0126 · Cited by 230
Etesami, H., Alikhani, H. A., & Mirseyed Hosseini, H. (2015) · Sustainable Development and Biodiversity · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24654-3_8 · Cited by 96
Trace element phytoextraction from contaminated soil: a case study under Mediterranean climate
Guidi Nissim, W., Palm, E., Mancuso, S., & Azzarello, E. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1197-x · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Abou‐Shanab, R., Angle, J., Delorme, T., Chaney, R., Van Berkum, P., Moawad, H., Ghanem, K., & Ghozlan, H.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03-18
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-224
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1967865234
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhizobacterial effects on nickel extraction from soil and uptake by Alyssum murale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00721.x
- The paper
- Abou‐Shanab, R., Angle, J., Delorme, T., Chaney, R., Van Berkum, P., Moawad, H., Ghanem, K., & Ghozlan, H. (2003). Rhizobacterial effects on nickel extraction from soil and uptake by Alyssum murale. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00721.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.