The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Farmers' markets: consuming local rural produce
Abstract
Marketing food directly from producers to consumers, so circumventing the ‘middlemen’ in the food supply chain, has many potential benefits. For consumers, direct marketing initiatives are providing people with locally grown, fresh, healthy and, in many cases, organic food at affordable prices. Through buying locally grown produce, consumers are giving their support to local producers as well as helping to revitalize rural economies. Producers benefit through retaining more of the value of their produce, which can help them survive through the current crisis in UK farming. There are also environmental benefits. Creating markets where people can buy produce from local farmers and growers reduces the distance that food travels between producers and consumers, which in turn decreases global environmental pollution. One direct marketing scheme – the farmers’ market – has proved to be particularly popular with local people, producers and the local councils, organizations and institutions who are involved in setting them up. This paper focuses on one such market, the Stour Valley Farmers' Market, which commenced trading on 20th June 1999. Customers who attended the first three of these monthly markets were interviewed to investigate the reasons for their attendance at the market, and their attitudes towards a number of food issues including organic and genetically modified food, local and seasonal food and concerns they may have over the way their food is produced. The research has shown that most customers visited the markets initially out of curiosity, although some attended specifically to buy healthy fresh foods. The vast majority of interviewees expressed a preference for food which is organically grown and free from genetic modification. Organic foods are generally perceived to be healthier and more flavoursome. When buying fresh foods, interviewees stated the importance of quality and freshness in their choice of produce.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Forage for Thought: Mobilizing Codes in the Movement for Grass-fed Meat and Dairy Products
Weber, K., Heinze, K. L., & DeSoucey, M. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.529 · Cited by 787
Priefer, C., Jörissen, J., & Bräutigam, K.-R. (2016) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.004 · Cited by 434
Local, national and imported foods: A qualitative study
Chambers, S., Lobb, A., Butler, L., Harvey, K., & Bruce Traill, W. (2007) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.003 · Cited by 386
Giampietri, E., Verneau, F., Del Giudice, T., Carfora, V., & Finco, A. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.09.012 · Cited by 292
Feeding the ‘organic child’: Mothering through ethical consumption
Cairns, K., Johnston, J., & MacKendrick, N. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540513480162 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Trobe, H. L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Consumer Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 181-192
- ISSN
- 1470-6423 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-6431
- OpenAlex
- W4233778551
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Farmers' markets: consuming local rural produce. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1470-6431.2001.00171.x
- The paper
- Trobe, H. L. (2001). Farmers' markets: consuming local rural produce. International Journal of Consumer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1470-6431.2001.00171.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.