The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Dopamine Uptake in the Basolateral Amygdaloid Nucleus, Caudate‐Putamen, and Nucleus Accumbens of the Rat
Abstract
Abstract: Regional differences in the kinetics and pharmacological inhibition of dopamine uptake were investigated with fast‐scan cyclic voltammetry in both the intact rat brain and a brain slice preparation. The regions compared were the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus, caudate‐putamen, and nucleus accumbens. The frequency dependence of dopamine efflux evoked in vivo by electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle was evaluated by nonlinear curve fitting with a Michaelis‐Menten‐based kinetic model. The Km for dopamine uptake was found to be significantly higher in the basolateral amygdala (0.6 µ M) than in the other two regions (0.2 µ M), whereas the Vmax value for dopamine uptake in the basolateral amygdala was significantly lower (0.49 µ M/s vs. 3.8 and 2.4 µ M/s in the caudate and accumbens, respectively). Similar kinetics were also obtained in brain slices. Addition of a dopamine uptake inhibitor, cocaine or nomifensine (10 µ M), to the perfusion buffer increased the apparent Km value >25‐fold in slices of both the caudate‐putamen and nucleus accumbens. In contrast, neither uptake inhibitor had an observable effect in the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus. Thus, dopamine uptake in the rat brain is regionally distinct with regard to rate, affinity, and sensitivity to competitive inhibition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hyperlocomotion and indifference to cocaine and amphetamine in mice lacking the dopamine transporter
Giros, B., Jaber, M., Jones, S. R., Wightman, R. M., & Caron, M. G. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379606a0 · Cited by 2,476
Self-citationMechanisms of Amphetamine Action Revealed in Mice Lacking the Dopamine Transporter
Jones, S. R., Gainetdinov, R. R., Wightman, R. M., & Caron, M. G. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-06-01979.1998 · Cited by 631
Self-citationDiffusion and related transport mechanisms in brain tissue
Nicholson, C. (2001) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/64/7/202 · Cited by 490
Relapse to cocaine-seeking after hippocampal theta burst stimulation
Vorel, S. R., Liu, X., Hayes, R. J., Spector, J. A., & Gardner, E. L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058043 · Cited by 486
Robinson, D. L., Heien, M. L. A. V., & Wightman, R. M. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-23-10477.2002 · Cited by 290
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, S. R., Garris, P. A., Kilts, C. D., & Wightman, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2581-2589
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W1990567511
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Dopamine Uptake in the Basolateral Amygdaloid Nucleus, Caudate‐Putamen, and Nucleus Accumbens of the Rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64062581.x
- The paper
- Jones, S. R., Garris, P. A., Kilts, C. D., & Wightman, R. M. (1995). Comparison of Dopamine Uptake in the Basolateral Amygdaloid Nucleus, Caudate‐Putamen, and Nucleus Accumbens of the Rat. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64062581.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.