The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increased Nuclear DNA Oxidation in the Brain in Alzheimer's Disease
Abstract
Abstract: Multiple lines of evidence indicate that oxidative stress is a contributor to neuronal death in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The oxidative damage that occurs to DNA may play a role in both normal aging and neurodegenerative diseases, including AD. This is a study of the oxidative damage that occurs in nuclear DNA in the brains of AD patients and cognitively intact, prospectively evaluated, age‐matched control subjects. Nuclear DNA from frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes and cerebellum was isolated from 11 control subjects and 9 AD subjects, and oxidized purine and pyrimidine bases were quantitated using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Stable isotope‐labeled oxidized base analogues were used as internal standards to measure 5‐hydroxyuracil, 5‐hydroxycytosine, 8‐hydroxyadenine, 4,6‐diamino‐5‐formamidopyrimidine (Fapy‐adenine), 8‐hydroxyguanine, and 2,6‐diamino‐4‐hydroxy‐5‐formamidopyrimidine (Fapy‐guanine). Statistically significant elevations of 5‐hydroxycytosine, 5‐hydroxyuracil, 8‐hydroxyadenine, and 8‐hydroxyguanine were found in AD brain compared with control subjects (p < 0.05). There was an increased trend in the levels of Fapy‐adenine in the AD brain, and Fapy‐guanine showed a trend toward higher levels in control brains compared with AD. A generally higher level of oxidative DNA damage was present in neocortical regions than cerebellum. No significant correlation was observed between the oxidized bases and neurofibrillary tangle and senile plaque counts. Our results demonstrate that nuclear DNA damage by oxygen‐derived radicals is increased in AD and support the concept that the brain is under increased oxidative stress in AD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress
Barnham, K. J., Masters, C. L., & Bush, A. I. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1330 · Cited by 3,683
Oxidative stress and the amyloid beta peptide in Alzheimer’s disease
Cheignon, C., Tomas, M., Bonnefont-Rousselot, D., Faller, P., Hureau, C., & Collin, F. (2018) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2017.10.014 · Cited by 2,185
Oxidative Damage Is the Earliest Event in Alzheimer Disease
Nunomura, A., Perry, G., Aliev, G., Hirai, K., Takeda, A., Balraj, E. K., Jones, P. K., Ghanbari, H., Wataya, T., Shimohama, S., et al. (2001) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/60.8.759 · Cited by 1,885
Halliwell, B. (2001) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.2165/00002512-200118090-00004 · Cited by 1,502
Evidence of oxidative damage in Alzheimer's disease brain: central role for amyloid β-peptide
Butterfield, D. A., Drake, J., Pocernich, C., & Castegna, A. (2001) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/s1471-4914(01)02173-6 · Cited by 1,114
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabbita, S. P., Lovell, M. A., & Markesbery, W. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2034-2040
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W2049972682
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Nuclear DNA Oxidation in the Brain in Alzheimer's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71052034.x
- The paper
- Gabbita, S. P., Lovell, M. A., & Markesbery, W. R. (1998). Increased Nuclear DNA Oxidation in the Brain in Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71052034.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.