Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Levels, Metabolism, and Pharmacological Activity of Anandamide in CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Knockout Mice: Evidence for Non‐CB1, Non‐CB2 Receptor‐Mediated Actions of Anandamide in Mouse Brain

Di Marzo, Vincenzo, Breivogel, Chris S., Tao, Qing, Bridgen, David T., Razdan, Raj K., Zimmer, Anne M., Zimmer, Andreas, Martin, Billy R.·2000·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Abstract: Anandamide [arachidonylethanolamide (AEA)] appears to be an endogenous agonist of brain cannabinoid receptors (CB 1), yet some of the neurobehavioral effects of this compound in mice are unaffected by a selective CB 1 antagonist. We studied the levels, pharmacological actions, and degradation of AEA in transgenic mice lacking the CB 1 gene. We quantified AEA and the other endocannabinoid, 2‐arachidonoyl glycerol, in six brain regions and the spinal cord by isotope‐dilution liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry. The distribution of endocannabinoids and their inactivating enzyme, fatty acid amide hydrolase, were found to overlap with CB 1 distribution only in part. In CB 1 knockout homozygotes (CB 1‐/‐), the hippocampus and, to a lesser extent, the striatum exhibited lower AEA levels as compared with wild‐type (CB 1+/+) controls. These data suggest a ligand/receptor relationship between AEA and CB 1 in these two brain regions, where tonic activation of the receptor may tightly regulate the biosynthesis of its endogenous ligand. 2‐Arachidonoyl glycerol levels and fatty acid amide hydrolase activity were unchanged in CB 1‐/‐ with respect to CB 1+/+ mice in all regions. AEA and Δ 9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) were tested in CB 1‐/‐ mice for their capability of inducing analgesia and catalepsy and decreasing spontaneous activity. The effects of AEA, unlike THC, were not decreased in CB 1‐/‐ mice. AEA, but not THC, stimulated GTPγS binding in brain membranes from CB 1‐/‐ mice, and this stimulation was insensitive to CB 1 and CB 2 antagonists. We suggest that non‐CB 1, non‐CB 2 G protein‐coupled receptors might mediate in mice some of the neuro‐behavioral actions of AEA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0752434.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Di Marzo, V., Breivogel, C. S., Tao, Q., Bridgen, D. T., Razdan, R. K., Zimmer, A. M., Zimmer, A., & Martin, B. R.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
2434-2444
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1830687359
Cited by
393
References
7
FWCI
18.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.