Patterns and trends in the discovery of new Neotropical mammals
Abstract
Abstract . Each year new mammalian taxa are described from the Neotropics but, contrary to conventional wisdom, these are not solely rats and bats. Since the publication of the last world checklist in 1992, new species and genera have been described from six orders (Didelphimorphia, Paucituberculata, Insectivora, Chiroptera, Primates and Rodentia) and from all South American countries except Guyana, Bolivia and Paraguay. Names and bibliographic references are listed for seven new genera and 57 new species of Neotropical mammals, representing an average of one new genus and eight new species annually. Each year, systematists revalidate an even greater number of names that were previously thought to constitute taxonomic synonyms. Consequently, estimates of mammalian diversity remain imprecise, especially in the tropics, and the pace of new descriptions outstrips even the most recent checklists.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In mammals, recent advances in morphometric, molecular, statistical, and ecological tools used to distinguish previously cryptic taxa-coupled with the increasing globalization of mammalogical research efforts-have led to widespread taxonomic changes.
“In mammals, recent advances in the morphometric, molecular, statistical, and ecological tools used to distinguish previously cryptic taxa—coupled with the increasing globalization of mammalogical research efforts—have led to widespread taxonomic changes (Patterson 2000; Reeder et al. 2007; Burgin et al. 2018; Álvarez-Castañeda et al. 2019).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Patterson 2000
These geographic concentrations of mammal taxonomic activity are consistent with previous estimates.
“These geographic concentrations of mammal taxonomic activity are consistent with previous estimates (Patterson 2000; Reeder et al. 2007; Burgin et al. 2018; Moura and Jetz 2021).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Patterson 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burgin, C. J., Zijlstra, J. S., Becker, M. A., Handika, H., Alston, J. M., Widness, J., Liphardt, S., Huckaby, D. G., & Upham, N. S. (2025) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaf047 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Patterson, B. D.
- Affiliations
- Field Museum of Natural History (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patterson, Bruce D.
- ORCID
- Patterson, Bruce D.
- Venue
- Diversity and Distributions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 145-151
- ISSN
- 0967-9952 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-9516
- 1472-4642
- OpenAlex
- W2118720515
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diversity and Distributions (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- Neotropical mammals, new species, new genus, mammal taxonomy, species discovery, taxonomic synonymy, mammal diversity, Didelphimorphia, Paucituberculata, Insectivora, bats, primates, rodents, South America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review